Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 of 58, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedRhythms
9Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Rhythms was named 1 time in Goals and OKRs, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business57 of 63
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market61 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise23 of 61
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Rhythms for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 61 of 68 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Rhythms held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 55 of 62, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 31 → 35 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 68, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Rhythms across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Rhythms across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“all tripped basic functional tests in hands-on testing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Rhythms, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rhythms was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Rhythms, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rhythms was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rhythms. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Rhythms and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tability.io9
mooncamp.com7
okrstool.com7
profit.co7
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
perdoo.com4
resources.rework.com4
workboard.com4
cascade.app3
firsthr.app3
Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Rhythms came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on rhythms.ai
476
subdomains included
Content
263
counted in the table below
Documentation
153
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 241 | 73 | 2026-09-24 | Goals and OKRs | |
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 4 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 2 | 2026-08-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Blog old blog
- 2026-09-24Business review templates old blog
- 2026-09-24Business operations blog
- 2026-09-24Business operations blog
- 2026-09-24Rhythms in slack blog
- 2026-09-24Rhythms in slack blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page rhythms.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Rhythms
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Rhythms is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Rhythms is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI that helps run the company.
- For
- Business & Functional Leaders; Operations Leaders; Managers & Team Leaders; Chiefs of Staff & Strategy Operations
- Price stated
- Rhythms starts at $12 per user per month (Pro plan) with all four products included — Goals, Playbooks, Radar, and Reviews. The Business plan is $28 per user per month with advanced security and 4× AI capacity. Enterprise plans are custom-priced. rhythms.ai
- Starting price
- 12 rhythms.ai
- Free plan or trial
- Every plan includes a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. rhythms.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 200 rhythms.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRCCPA
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- AmgenUPSGoDaddyCienaSentinelOne
What Rhythms's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: rhythms.ai, trust.rhythms.ai, rhythms.ai/solutions/goals, rhythms.ai/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rhythms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rhythms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rhythms by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Rhythms is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rhythms, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.