Every category where a model named Cascade Strategy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	2%	14 of 68	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Cascade Strategy held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 35 → 56 of 58

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 45 of 62

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 13 → 12 of 54

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Goals and OKRs	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 20 → 14 of 68

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Cascade Strategy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best overall for strategic alignment: Cascade Strategy” Muse Glimmer 30B · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“It is significantly more expensive and complex to implement than Mooncamp or Perdoo; smaller teams often find it overkill.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · soft negative

“though it needs a dedicated strategy team to run well” Muse Glimmer 30B · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cascade Strategy, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cascade Strategy was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Perdoo17 of 222Not among the top eight

Betterworks17 of 221Not among the top eight

WorkBoard15 of 221Not among the top eight

Mooncamp14 of 222Not among the top eight

Lattice14 of 221Not among the top eight

Profit.co14 of 221Not among the top eight

Tability9 of 224Not among the top eight

OKRs Tool9 of 222Not among the top eight

Quantive9 of 220Not among the top eight

Weekdone8 of 221Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cascade Strategy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Cascade Strategy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mooncamp.com20

okrstool.com20

tability.io20

profit.co11

cascade.appYour site10

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

okrinstitute.org9

workboard.com9

synergita.com8

teamflect.com8

115 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Cascade Strategy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software16

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software15

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise14

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software11

cascade.app/blog/best-okr-softwares9

mooncamp.com/blog/okr-software-enterprise9

okrinstitute.org/blog-best-okr-software8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/okr-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cascade.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cascade Strategy takes 2% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “okr tools”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “okr software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 210 a month (“cascade strategy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 23 a month
Its company's site: cascade.app shared with Cascade's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 56,016 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 15,118 · 533 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,062
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 10 image, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Responsis PTY LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 14 of 68 in goals and okrs

Segment leader

24%

Perdoo

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Cascade Strategy

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cascade Strategy; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cascade 4

Follow Cascade Strategy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cascade is the company behind Cascade Strategy.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: For every 1,000 employees, poor strategy execution costs organizations an estimated $180m in unrealized value.
cascade.app/cascade-roi
For: Organizations
cascade.app/meet-cascade
Free plan or trial: free 30 min demo cascade.app/meet-cascade
Certifications: The only Balanced Scorecard platform the Institute endorses.Fully SOC 2 compliant
Hosting: UAESaudi Arabia
Customers named: Mercedes Benz
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations

What Cascade Strategy's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cascade.app/cascade-roi, cascade.app/meet-cascade, cascade.app/strategy-platform, support.cascade.app/1.1-why-cascade, cascade.app/gcc-strategy-software. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cascade Strategy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cascade Strategy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cascade Strategy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Cascade Strategy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cascade Strategy, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.