Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 14 of 89
1 category · Named, not rankedRedeApp
11Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. RedeApp was named 3 times in Frontline employee apps, where Connecteam led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 90
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 106
4%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 91
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RedeApp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 4% | 6 of 106 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RedeApp held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 100
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 40 → 18 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 7% | 5% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 6 of 106 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RedeApp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RedeApp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need a dedicated frontline solution with no cost to start, RedeApp's free plan is unbeatable.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · first choice
“RedeApp and Beekeeper are the top choices due to their mobile-first design” Mistral Small · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RedeApp, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RedeApp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RedeApp, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RedeApp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RedeApp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named RedeApp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
redeapp.comYour site11
agilityportal.io6
mangoapps.com6
guideflow.com5
joinblink.com5
turnonwork.com5
getflip.com4
changeengine.com3
firsthr.app3
getzelos.com3
Forty of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming RedeApp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
redeapp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RedeApp takes 4% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
redeapp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RedeApp takes 4% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“redeapp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,489 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 341 · 10 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 472
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on redeapp.com
223
subdomains included
Content
143
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 12
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 118 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | Workforce management sui, Employee engagement surv | |
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2025-04-16 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Frontline already has the answers blog
- 2026-09-09Hipaa compliant staff communication guide blog
- 2026-09-04Workforce engagement analytics communication data blog
- 2026-09-02Workforce analytics vs workforce intelligence comparison
- 2026-08-28Deskless workforce platform technology gap blog
- 2026-08-26Mobile workforce software non desk workers blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page redeapp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow RedeApp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RedeApp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
RedeApp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Mobile Agentic OS for Frontline Teams
- For
- frontline and deskless organizations
- Price stated
- RedeApp Go is a free tier for frontline teams. RedeApp Pro is $7.00 per employee per month published list; volume pricing at scale. redeapp.com
- Starting price
- 0 redeapp.com
- Free plan or trial
- RedeApp Go redeapp.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 redeapp.com/enterprise/partners
- Certifications
- DPF participantSOC 2 Type IIHIPAA
- Customers named
- Trilogy Health ServicesSeminole GamingWalker ConstructionVolare HealthOtterbein Senior LifeLouisville Paving and ConstructionIndependent Adult Day CenterLegend Senior Living
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What RedeApp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: redeapp.com, redeapp.com/pricing, redeapp.com/security, redeapp.com/customers, redeapp.com/enterprise/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RedeApp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RedeApp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RedeApp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RedeApp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RedeApp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.