AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Quantum Workplace · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Quantum Workplace

18Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quantum Workplace was named 9 times in Employee engagement surv and 2 other categories, where Culture Amp led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee engagement surv · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quantum Workplace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%19 of 5814%7under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%50 of 850%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%52 of 930%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Quantum Workplace held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Employee engagement surv · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 64 of 118, unchanged
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 20 of 53
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 of 96, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Employee engagement surv2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 19 of 58
Performance management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 50 of 85, unchanged
Succession planning0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 36 → 52 of 93

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Quantum Workplace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Want a mid-market focused engagement + performance combo with strong support: Quantum Workplace.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for performance/talent-review-driven succession: Cornerstone, Quantum Workplace” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong engagement and pulse surveys with rigorous methodology; pricing is quote-only.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Alternatives if simpler/cheaper: Quantum Workplace or CultureMonkey for pure surveys” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid "Enterprise Trap" Tools ... and Quantum Workplace” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quantum Workplace, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantum Workplace was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Lattice13 of 183Not among the top eight
Culture Amp11 of 184Not among the top eight
Leapsome9 of 184Not among the top eight
Workleap Officevibe9 of 182Not among the top eight
15Five Engage8 of 181Not among the top eight
Teamflect5 of 181Not among the top eight
BambooHR4 of 181Not among the top eight
Microsoft Viva Glint4 of 181Not among the top eight
15Five4 of 180Not among the top eight
Qualtrics EmployeeXM3 of 182Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quantum Workplace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Quantum Workplace and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

quantumworkplace.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quantum Workplace takes 0% of first choices and Culture Amp takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “engagement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee engagement survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“quantum workplace”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
52 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 72,378 a month
Searches its site ranks for
8,872 · 1,076 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,195
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 394 clicks and $4,285 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
107 ads · 66 image, 35 text, 6 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Quantum Market Research, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 62 in the year, 45 before. 12 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 58 in employee engagement surv
Segment leader
37%
Culture Amp
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
18 answers
Its own site cited
in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on quantumworkplace.com
1,473
subdomains included
Content
486
counted in the table below
Documentation
658
Product · Integration
22 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook157undatedPerformance management, Employee onboarding
Case study9712026-09-18Succession planning, Performance management
Blog8002025-11-06Succession planning, Performance management
News or press78undatedPerformance management, Succession planning
Webinar or virtual event49undatedPerformance management, Succession planning
Template or tool11undated
Glossary or explainer1102026-01-28
Comparison2undated
Conference or event1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page quantumworkplace.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Quantum Workplace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Quantum Workplace is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
all-in-one HR software platform that connects employee engagement, performance, development, and recognition
For
HR leaders, people managers, and executives at growing organizations
Price stated
Quantum Workplace offers flexible HR software pricing based on your organization’s size and the tools you choose. You only pay for what you need—whether that’s employee engagement, performance management, employee development or employee recognition software. We provide scalable subscriptions and multi-year options to fit your goals and budget. quantumworkplace.com
Starting price
15000 quantumworkplace.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliantSOC2 certified for data security
Customers named
Sarah BeckSonja T.Marie PotterClaire FetcheroShannon CarsonPatty NashAngel BirchGetty Images
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Quantum Workplace's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: quantumworkplace.com, quantumworkplace.com/pricing, trust.quantumworkplace.com, quantumworkplace.com/platform, quantumworkplace.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantum Workplace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantum Workplace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quantum Workplace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Quantum Workplace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quantum Workplace, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quantumworkplace.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.