Every category where a model named Leapsome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	12%	3 of 58	6%	17	accepted challenger	▲+13Since September 2026: 0% → 13%, +13 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	11%	3 of 73	0%	42	accepted challenger	▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance management	Performance and talent management	5%	5 of 85	0%	36	accepted challenger	▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	4%	8 of 93	19%	16	accepted challenger	▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	4%	11 of 98	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	18 of 68	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24%	▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	36 of 114	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	41 of 128	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	0%	37 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	71 of 118	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	56 of 140	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	69 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, Leapsome moved past the floor in one of twelve categories: Employee engagement surv, +13 points to 13%. It held within the floor in the other eleven.

Best category · Employee engagement surv · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 103 of 118

Mid-market▲+13Since September 2026: 0% → 13%, +13 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.

13%from 0% in September 2026

Cleared the floor by 0 pointsRank 13 → 2 of 53

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 19 of 96

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Employee engagement surv	0%	13%	▲+13Since September 2026: 0% → 13%, +13 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.	Moved past the floor	Rank 13 → 3 of 58
360 feedback	0%	11%	▲+11Since September 2026: 0% → 11%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 16 → 3 of 73
Goals and OKRs	4%	0%	▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 7 → 18 of 68
Workforce planning	0%	4%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.	New this edition	Rank 11 of 98, unchanged
Succession planning	0%	4%	▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 21 → 8 of 93
Performance management	2%	6%	▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 8 → 5 of 85
People analytics	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 27 → 36 of 114
Coaching platforms	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 72 → 41 of 128
Leave	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 31 → 37 of 95
Candidate assessment	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 71 of 118, unchanged
Compensation management	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 56 of 140, unchanged
Employee onboarding	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 40 → 69 of 87

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Leapsome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	6	2	1	10
GPT-5.4 mini	0	4	2	0	6
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	12	0	0	15
Perplexity Sonar	3	4	1	1	9
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	9	5	0	15
Mistral Small	2	4	3	1	10
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	7	2	1	12
Llama 4 Maverick	3	0	5	0	8
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	5	1	1	8
Kimi K2	1	8	2	0	11
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	8	1	0	10
MiniMax M2.5	2	4	0	1	7
GPT-6 Luna	1	4	0	0	5
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	6	3	1	10

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct68 labels12

Paraphrase56 labels15

Comparative76 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained25 labels6

Scale-constrained44 labels2

Negative40 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative309 labels in all, every segment counted; 35 of the 41 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Leapsome - Surveys, performance reviews, learning, goal management for growing companies seeking an all-in-one people platform.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · first choice

“Offers flexible pricing starting at $3 per user per month, making it a viable option for scaling teams with limited budgets.” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce planning · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose Lattice for a highly polished, US-centric market leader, or Leapsome if you have a global/European footprint” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For the absolute lowest budget, Effy AI, Zoho People, Teamflect, or Leapsome's free plans are excellent starting points.” Mistral Small · Performance management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid platforms like Culture Amp, Leapsome, or Qualtrics” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · hard negative

“Tools like Lattice, Leapsome, Betterworks... often fall short when strategy or operations teams need a leadership cockpit.” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

“Lattice and Leapsome reach succession through performance tiers carrying $4,000 and $6,000 annual minimums.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Succession planning · negative prompt · soft negative

“The UI can feel unclear and time-consuming when trying to find specific data, goal updates are more manual” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leapsome, over the 309 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leapsome was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice232 of 30953Compare →

Culture Amp145 of 30927Compare →

15Five134 of 30913Compare →

Betterworks86 of 30911Not among the top eight

BambooHR81 of 30911Compare →

PerformYard68 of 3096Compare →

Spidergap42 of 3097Compare →

Teamflect41 of 3094Compare →

SAP SuccessFactors36 of 3092Not among the top eight

Effy AI33 of 3096Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leapsome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 298 of the 309 answers that named Leapsome and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

betterworks.com138

workhuman.com137

peoplemanagingpeople.com114

feedbackpulse.com100

engagedly.com84

capterra.com78

firsthr.app73

g2.com70

guideflow.com70

leapsome.comYour site66

864 of the 930 domain citations in answers naming Leapsome came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools79

workhuman.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-tools57

teamflect.com/blog/hr-tech/best-360-feedback-tools53

sprad.io/provider-categories/360-degree-feedback42

workhuman.com/blog/best-performance-management-software42

betterworks.com/magazine/best-performance-management-software40

charliehr.com/performance-management/360-feedback-tools37

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-360-review-software37

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

leapsome.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leapsome takes 12% of first choices and Culture Amp takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “engagement platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee engagement survey platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,900 a month (“leapsome”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 32 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 51,450 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 13,327 · 793 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,912
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 994 clicks and $18,531 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

84 ads · 79 text, 3 image, 2 video · 60 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as Leapsome GmbH, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 47 in the year, 37 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

12%

rank 3 of 58 in employee engagement surv

Segment leader

37%

Culture Amp

First choices: 35 across its categories
Named in: 309 answers
Its own site cited: in 298 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on leapsome.com

11,339

subdomains included

Content

1,408

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

114 · 211

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	938	82	2026-09-25
Case study	122	undated
Conference or event	115	2	2026-09-15
Report or ebook	63	undated
Comparison	54	9	2026-09-15
Template or tool	46	1	2026-09-15
Webinar or virtual event	24	undated
Glossary or explainer	22	5	2026-09-15
Podcast or video	14	undated
News or press	10	1	2026-09-15

Most recent

2026-09-25Areas of improvement performance review examples blog
2026-09-25One on one meeting template blog
2026-09-25Performance review questions blog
2026-09-25Workplace goals examples blog
2026-09-22Career development questions blog
2026-09-22Payroll preparation blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page leapsome.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Leapsome

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Leapsome is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered HR software and people platform
leapsome.com
For: For lean people teams with outsized business impact.
leapsome.com
Free plan or trial: Book Free Demo Now leapsome.com/product/integrations
Integrations claimed: 100 leapsome.com
Certifications: ISO 27001SOC IIISO 27001 certifiedSOC 2 certifiedGDPREU AI Act27001:2022
Customers named: Beat81Mark43TicketSwapJINAPersonioOrbisMKCDrFirst
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, hosting

What Leapsome's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leapsome.com, trust.leapsome.com, leapsome.com/platform-tour, leapsome.com/customers, leapsome.com/product/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leapsome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leapsome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leapsome by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Leapsome is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leapsome, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Leapsome is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Employee engagement surveys

Leapsome is among the products AI models recommend first in Employee engagement surveys this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-engagement-surveys/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/leapsome--employee-engagement-surveys-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Employee engagement surveys, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee engagement surveys standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-engagement-surveys/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/leapsome--employee-engagement-surveys-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Employee engagement surveys, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee engagement surveys standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-engagement-surveys/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/leapsome--employee-engagement-surveys-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Employee engagement surveys, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee engagement surveys standing, where the claim can be checked.

360 feedback

Leapsome is among the products AI models recommend first in 360 feedback this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/360-feedback/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/leapsome--360-feedback-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in 360 feedback, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the 360 feedback standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/360-feedback/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/leapsome--360-feedback-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in 360 feedback, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the 360 feedback standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/360-feedback/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/leapsome--360-feedback-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in 360 feedback, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the 360 feedback standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.