| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 13% | 2 of 58 | 6% | 35 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 12% → 12%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 27 of 85 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee engagement surv | 12% | 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 12% → 12%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 58, unchanged |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 27 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Workleap (Officevibe) at $5/user/month appears to be the best balance of features, affordability, and ease of use” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · first choice
“Workleap Officevibe stands out as the best dedicated employee engagement platform for budget-conscious companies” Kimi K2 · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · first choice
“Officevibe is often cited as the best value for small budgets due to its low per-user cost and simplicity” Mistral Small · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Workleap Officevibe if your main goal is lightweight, ongoing employee pulse surveys” GPT-6 Luna · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“don't shortlist Officevibe based on older $5-per-person pricing articles: Workleap's current published plans start at $4,999/year” GPT-6 Luna · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · hard negative
“a simpler, much more affordable alternative to Workleap (formerly Officevibe), which recently retired its popular free/cheap tier” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 100 answers that named Workleap Officevibe and are not a share of its labels.
392 of the 392 domain citations in answers naming Workleap Officevibe came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Workleap Officevibe's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workleap.com/officevibe, workleap.com/officevibe/surveys, workleap.com/officevibe/goodvibes, workleap.com/vs/workleap-vs-bamboo-hr, workleap.com/vs/workleap-vs-culture-amp. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workleap Officevibe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workleap Officevibe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workleap Officevibe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Workleap Officevibe is among the products AI models recommend first in Employee engagement surveys this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.