Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 65 of 101, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedPerceptyx
14Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Perceptyx was named 3 times in People analytics and 1 other category, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market50 of 114
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise28 of 79
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Perceptyx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 50 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 55 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Perceptyx held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 → 27 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 114, unchanged |
| HR compliance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 97, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Perceptyx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Perceptyx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Best for High-Compliance/Security: Perceptyx” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Perceptyx, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Perceptyx was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Perceptyx, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Perceptyx was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Perceptyx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named Perceptyx and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
culturemonkey.io7
thrivesparrow.com6
capterra.com5
feedbackpulse.com5
workhuman.com5
eletive.com4
hrcloud.com4
sogolytics.com4
assessmentcloud.com3
checkthat.ai3
Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Perceptyx came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on perceptyx.com
839
subdomains included
Content
761
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
31 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 592 | 35 | 2026-09-28 | People analytics, 360 feedback | |
| Case study | 114 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | ||
| News or press | 20 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | People analytics | |
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Perceptyx built the most accurate employee feedback sentiment model blog
- 2026-09-24Nearly 40 of employees dont know which skills their companies will need next blog
- 2026-09-22Why do leading organizations choose perceptyx over qualtrics for employee experience blog
- 2026-09-17What happens when you measure comprehension instead of completion blog
- 2026-09-16What does it take to move employees from ai access to ai adoption blog
- 2026-09-11Why don t employee survey action plans drive business outcomes blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page perceptyx.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Perceptyx
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Perceptyx is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Perceptyx is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Employee Experience Platform
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIHITRUST CSF®EU-U.S. Data Privacy FrameworkFedRAMP authorizedISO 27001GDPRCCPA
- Customers named
- OrganonHangerService ExpressAmtrakVNS HealthPrudential
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Perceptyx's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: perceptyx.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Perceptyx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Perceptyx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Perceptyx by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Perceptyx is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Perceptyx, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.