Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 9 of 60
4 categories · RankedThriveSparrow
60Judge labels
8First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Performance management for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 63
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 73
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise54 of 69
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In 360 feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ThriveSparrow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 2% | 12 of 73 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee engagement surveys | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 27 of 58 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 26 of 85 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 80 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ThriveSparrow held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · 360 feedback · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 12 of 69
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 48 of 59
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee engagement surv | 8% | 0% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 27 of 58 |
| 360 feedback | 5% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 12 of 73 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 26 of 85 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 80 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ThriveSparrow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ThriveSparrow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase10 labels1
Comparative13 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels4
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative10 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“### 1. ThriveSparrow - Standout Feature: AI-powered Personal Development Plans” MiniMax M2.5 · 360 feedback · comparative prompt · first choice
“ThriveSparrow or AssessTEAM at $2/user/month offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommended for HR teams at mid-sized companies needing dedicated tools for structured feedback and engagement programs.” Mistral Small · 360 feedback · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Recommended for companies under 200 employees, offering robust features at a competitive price.” Mistral Small · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ThriveSparrow, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThriveSparrow was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ThriveSparrow, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThriveSparrow was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThriveSparrow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 60 answers that named ThriveSparrow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com38
workhuman.com36
thrivesparrow.comYour site27
effy.ai25
capterra.com24
betterworks.com21
forbes.com18
feedbackpulse.com15
firsthr.app15
g2.com15
207 of the 234 domain citations in answers naming ThriveSparrow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
thrivesparrow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ThriveSparrow takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
thrivesparrow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ThriveSparrow takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “360 feedback tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “360-degree feedback tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“thrivesparrow”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 24,978 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 16,967 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,569
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 73 in 360 feedback
Segment leader
34%
Lattice
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 60 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on thrivesparrow.com
1,433
subdomains included
Content
569
counted in the table below
Documentation
235
Product · Integration
17 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 419 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 65 | 8 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Comparison | 45 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2026-04-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Employee engagement survey vendors blog
- 2026-08-31Diversity and inclusion survey template or tool
- 2026-08-31Employee benefits survey template template or tool
- 2026-08-31Mid year performance review template or tool
- 2026-08-27Annual performance review template template or tool
- 2026-08-27Employee engagement survey template template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page thrivesparrow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ThriveSparrow
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ThriveSparrow is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ThriveSparrow is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native employee experience platform
- For
- companies, HR and people leaders, CEOs, HR, managers, and individual contributors
- Price stated
- half the price of the competition thrivesparrow.com
- Starting price
- 0 thrivesparrow.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial available thrivesparrow.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001GDPRSOC2 Type IICYBER ESSENTIALSCSA STAR Registry
- Customers named
- Dümmen OrangeAPL LogisticsTVS Srichakra Ltd, TVS Eurogrip , TVS Sensing SolutionsAlpha Aviation GroupLEAAGUNITINGFALCONVIZ
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What ThriveSparrow's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: thrivesparrow.com, thrivesparrow.com/pricing, thrivesparrow.com/legal/security, thrivesparrow.com/features/infer-ai, thrivesparrow.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThriveSparrow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThriveSparrow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ThriveSparrow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ThriveSparrow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ThriveSparrow, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.