Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 of 77, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedPeoplePilot
4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeoplePilot was named 3 times in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business50 of 81
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 114
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PeoplePilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 14 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PeoplePilot held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 13 of 101
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 14 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PeoplePilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PeoplePilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Look at Crunchr or PeoplePilot ($3\u2013$8/employee/month, 2\u20134 week implementation)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeoplePilot, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeoplePilot was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeoplePilot, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeoplePilot was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeoplePilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named PeoplePilot and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workhuman.com4
hr.university3
intervue.io3
zendikt.com3
assets.ctfassets.net2
basedash.com2
charthop.com2
hibob.com2
ovi-me.com2
peoplebox.ai2
Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming PeoplePilot came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peoplepilot.io
290
subdomains included
Content
166
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
28 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 106 | 7 | 2026-08-09 | People analytics, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 36 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | People analytics, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Comparison | 18 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | HRIS and HCM platforms, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-09Competency framework guide 2026 blog
- 2026-08-08Attrition analysis guide 2026 blog
- 2026-08-08Employee listening strategy 2026 blog
- 2026-08-07How to build a people analytics team 2026 blog
- 2026-08-06Hr data privacy gdpr 2026 blog
- 2026-08-05People analytics dashboard 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peoplepilot.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PeoplePilot
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PeoplePilot; a claim can dispute any of them.
PeoplePilot Analytics 1
Follow PeoplePilot
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PeoplePilot is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PeoplePilot is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI people analytics, surveys, learning & ATS platform
- For
- HR leaders, people teams, and organizations
- Price stated
- See pricing peoplepilot.io
- Starting price
- 0 peoplepilot.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14 days free. No credit card. peoplepilot.io
- Certifications
- AICM AlignedGDPR ReadySOC 2 Aligned ControlsAES-256 EncryptionGDPR Compliant
- Hosting
- EU data residency
- Customers named
- Lumen & Co.NorthwindKindred LabsOrbital HRHearthRiverbendSprigMonolith
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What PeoplePilot's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: peoplepilot.io, peoplepilot.io/pricing, peoplepilot.io/products/ats. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeoplePilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeoplePilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PeoplePilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PeoplePilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PeoplePilot, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.