Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 → 19 of 77
1 category · Named, not rankedPeopleInsight
8Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeopleInsight was named 3 times in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 81
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 114
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 79
2%1 label
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PeopleInsight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 12 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PeopleInsight held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 10 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 12 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PeopleInsight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PeopleInsight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PeopleInsight is the best balance of affordability and dedicated people analytics for a company with a limited budget.” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · budget prompt · first choice
“offers low-risk monthly pricing starting as low as $250/week, with cancellation flexibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · People analytics · budget prompt · alternative
“good if you want a people analytics platform with strong review sentiment” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleInsight, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleInsight was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleInsight, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleInsight was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleInsight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named PeopleInsight and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
effy.ai3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
dupple.com2
engagedly.com2
firsthr.app2
g2.com2
hibob.com2
hrbench.com2
leapsome.com2
learn.g2.com2
Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming PeopleInsight came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hireroad.com
310
subdomains included
Content
231
counted in the table below
Documentation
8
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 187 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | People analytics, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2025-10-30 | Compliance training, People analytics | |
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2025-01-16 | People analytics | |
| Podcast or video | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-17 | People analytics | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2024-10-10 | People analytics | |
| News or press | 5 | 0 | 2025-03-21 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-04-14 | People analytics | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-07-21 | Performance management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2024-02-08 | People analytics |
Most recent
- 2026-04-09Test integrations blog
- 2026-04-09Adp blog
- 2026-04-09Adp 2 blog
- 2025-12-03Key takeaways from the state of people analytics 2025 26 research blog
- 2025-12-02State of people analytics report 2025 2026 blog
- 2025-11-25Year end attrition risk blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hireroad.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PeopleInsight
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PeopleInsight; a claim can dispute any of them.
PeopleInsight by HireRoad 1
Follow PeopleInsight
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PeopleInsight is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PeopleInsight is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- People analytics made easy (& affordable)
- For
- HR and TA teams
- Price stated
- Starting at $250/week hireroad.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 250/week hireroad.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try before you buy hireroad.com
- Certifications
- SOC2GDPRAT 101 SOC 2 certifiedSOC 2 attestation reportISO-27701PCISOC 2GDPR-compliant
- Hosting
- Canada
- Customers named
- GoeasyBe BiopharmaFirst Citizen BankCollective Health
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What PeopleInsight's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: hireroad.com, hireroad.com/pricing, hireroad.com/security, hireroad.com/platform, hireroad.com/resources/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleInsight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleInsight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PeopleInsight by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PeopleInsight is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PeopleInsight, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.