Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 31 of 108, unchanged
Deel · 11 categories · RankedDeel HR
62Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
11Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in HR AI assistants for mid-market buyers
Rank 14 of 142 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business37 of 121
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 142
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In hr ai assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Deel HR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 14 of 142 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 12 of 121 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 28 of 93 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 22 of 98 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 29 of 108 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 27 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 41 of 140 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 37 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 38 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 61 of 148 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 36 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Compt at 40% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Deel HR held within the floor in all eleven categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · HR AI assistants · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 of 124, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 142, unchanged |
| Contingent workforce man | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 12 of 121 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 28 of 93 |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 22 of 98 |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 44 → 29 of 108 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 27 of 114 |
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 41 of 140 |
| 360 feedback | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 37 of 73 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 38 of 65 |
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 148, unchanged |
| Flexible benefits | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Deel HR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Deel HR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative24 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels2
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Deel HR: Best for workforce planning across borders, centralizes global payroll, contracts, compliance, and HR management” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“I would suggest starting with VectorVMS or Deel HR” MiniMax M2.5 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Deel HR (+ Deel AI)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR AI assistants · budget prompt · first choice
“Deel offers a free core HR platform for up to 200 employees. Adding their global compensation benchmarking and planning tools is extremely affordable” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Deel HR, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Deel HR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Deel HR, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Deel HR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Deel HR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 62 answers that named Deel HR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com51
g2.com23
firsthr.app17
guideflow.com17
talentguard.com13
workhuman.com12
worldmetrics.org11
gitnux.org10
capterra.com9
engagedly.com9
172 of the 172 domain citations in answers naming Deel HR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
deel.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Deel HR takes 2% of first choices and MeBeBot takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
deel.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Deel HR takes 2% of first choices and MeBeBot takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “hr ai assistants”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai assistant for hr teams”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“deel hr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Its company's site
- deel.com shared with Deel's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 307,175 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 63,403 · 2,895 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,848
- Paid Google search
- 412 searches its ads show for, about 29,117 clicks and $330,608 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 142 in HR AI assistants
Segment leader
21%
MeBeBot
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 62 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 60 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Deel HR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Deel HR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Deel 6BambooHR/Deel 1Deel HR (+ Deel AI) 1Deel HR / Deel 1
Follow Deel HR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Deel is the company behind Deel HR.ShowHide
The company
Deel is the company behind Deel HR.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Deel
- Deel, Deel Contractor, Deel Engage, Deel Hire, Deel PEO, Deel Payroll, Deel Workforce Planning
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Deel's Global HRIS built to scale with you, no matter who or where you are.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Deel HR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: deel.com/resources/deel-hris-case-study. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Deel HR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Deel HR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Deel HR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Deel HR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Deel HR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.