Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 13 of 67, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedPeopleGoal
15Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeopleGoal was named 3 times in Performance management and 1 other category, where Lattice led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 67
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 85
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PeopleGoal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 25 of 85 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 57 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% |
Movement
Since September 2026, PeopleGoal held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Performance management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 → 33 of 76
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 25 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PeopleGoal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PeopleGoal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“All-in reviews + OKRs on a flat rate from ~$4/user/month: PeopleGoal.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Performance management · budget prompt · alternative
“An emerging option specifically noted for flat-rate pricing models” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Performance management · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleGoal, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleGoal was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleGoal, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleGoal was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleGoal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named PeopleGoal and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com11
capterra.com10
effy.ai8
forbes.com8
workhuman.com8
g2.com6
joinhomebase.com6
engagedly.com5
hibob.com5
learn.g2.com5
Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming PeopleGoal came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
peoplegoal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PeopleGoal takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 43%.ShowHide
Search and answers
peoplegoal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PeopleGoal takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 43%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “performance management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “performance management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“peoplegoal”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 138,194 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,300 · 541 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,941
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown September 2026, as Batia Infotech, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 85 in performance management
Segment leader
43%
Lattice
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peoplegoal.com
539
subdomains included
Content
454
counted in the table below
Documentation
64
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 403 | 4 | 2026-09-10 | Performance management, Employee onboarding | |
| Comparison | 23 | 10 | 2026-09-21 | Performance management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2021-04-23 | Performance management | |
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2019-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | Performance management | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2020-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2021-06-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2020-09-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Synergita alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-16Primalogik alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-16Small improvements alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-10Performance management software manufacturing blog
- 2026-09-09Performance management software for accounting firms blog
- 2026-09-04Workleap officevibes alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peoplegoal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow PeopleGoal
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PeopleGoal is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PeopleGoal is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Performance Management Software to 3x Employee Productivity, Delightfully
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Free Plan; Per User, Per Month peoplegoal.com
- Starting price
- 0 peoplegoal.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Plan peoplegoal.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantGDPR & Privacy Compliance
- Hosting
- Heroku EU servers
- Customers named
- Leica GeosystemsiQmetrixViva WalletLuminor BankAtawayAbu Dhabi UniversityHealth-AdeSoftomotive
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What PeopleGoal's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: peoplegoal.com, peoplegoal.com, peoplegoal.com/pricing, peoplegoal.com/features, peoplegoal.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleGoal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleGoal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PeopleGoal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PeopleGoal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PeopleGoal, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.