Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 35 → 7 of 60
2 categories · Named, not rankedAssessTEAM
26Judge labels
7First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AssessTEAM was named 8 times in 360 feedback and 1 other category, where Lattice led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 63
4%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 73
6%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In 360 feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AssessTEAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 6% | 7 of 73 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 2% | 10 of 85 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AssessTEAM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · 360 feedback · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 5 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | 2% | 7% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 7 of 73 |
| Performance management | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 10 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AssessTEAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AssessTEAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained13 labels4
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose AssessTEAM ($2/mo) if you want a dedicated, automated tool on the absolute lowest ongoing budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want the lowest-cost practical recommendation, I'd pick AssessTEAM.” GPT-5.4 mini · Performance management · budget prompt · first choice
“or AssessTEAM if you want very affordable paid software with more flexibility” Perplexity Sonar · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice
“ThriveSparrow or AssessTEAM at $2/user/month offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“some customers report the software can be glitchy and has a steep learning curve, and the reports can be troublesome” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Performance management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AssessTEAM, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AssessTEAM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AssessTEAM, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AssessTEAM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AssessTEAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named AssessTEAM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
capterra.com17
effy.ai15
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
workhuman.com13
betterworks.com9
forbes.com8
engagedly.com7
selectsoftwarereviews.com7
teamflect.com7
usatoday.com7
103 of the 103 domain citations in answers naming AssessTEAM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
assessteam.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AssessTEAM takes 6% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
assessteam.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AssessTEAM takes 6% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “360 feedback tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “360-degree feedback tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“assessteam”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,097 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,681 · 45 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 860
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 7 of 73 in 360 feedback
Segment leader
34%
Lattice
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 26 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 26 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on assessteam.com
924
subdomains included
Content
246
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 209 | 5 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 8 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25How to calculate employee retention rate formula calculator strategies to improve retention template or tool
- 2026-09-25How to run effective 1 on 1 meetings a managers guide blog
- 2026-09-25Assessteam vs engagedly comparison
- 2026-09-25Assessteam vs lattice comparison
- 2026-08-20Ai driven kpis in 2026 how theyre changing performance reviews and goal setting blog
- 2026-08-20Assessteam vs leapsome comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page assessteam.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AssessTEAM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AssessTEAM; a claim can dispute any of them.
AssessTeam 1
Follow AssessTEAM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AssessTEAM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AssessTEAM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-driven performance management for every team
- For
- HR professionals, managers, and organizations
- Price stated
- AssessTEAM starts at $2/user/month for the Evaluations plan. Time Tracking is $3/user/month and Profitability is $4/user/month. There is no minimum number of users. Annual billing. Honest pricing with the same enterprise features as other performance management platforms, at a fraction of the cost. assessteam.com
- Starting price
- 2 assessteam.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial available. No credit card required. 10-day free guided trial. assessteam.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 assessteam.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting, customers
What AssessTEAM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: assessteam.com, assessteam.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AssessTEAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AssessTEAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AssessTEAM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AssessTEAM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AssessTEAM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.