Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 23 → 4 of 89
1 category · Named, not rankedPebb
16Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pebb was named 5 times in Frontline employee apps, where Connecteam led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 90
4%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 106
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pebb for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 10 of 106 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pebb held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 9 of 100
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 10 of 106 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pebb across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pebb across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a company with a very limited budget, the clear winner is Pebb — it's free for up to 1,000 users” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · first choice
“Pebb offers the most generous free tier (1,000 users)” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · alternative
“Runner Up: Pebb ... Why it’s a great alternative” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pebb, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pebb was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pebb, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pebb was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pebb. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Pebb and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
joinblink.com12
pebb.ioYour site12
firsthr.app11
shifton.com9
oak.com7
us.fitgap.com7
guideflow.com6
mangoapps.com6
rock.so6
capterra.com5
Sixty-nine of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Pebb came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pebb.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pebb takes 2% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pebb.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pebb takes 2% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“pebb”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 293 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,720 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,039 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 668
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pebb.io
1,486
subdomains included
Content
1,409
counted in the table below
Documentation
30
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 967 | 99 | 2026-09-29 | Employee onboarding, Internal communications | |
| Comparison | 269 | 30 | 2026-09-29 | Time and attendance, Workforce scheduling | |
| Glossary or explainer | 142 | 100 | 2026-09-29 | Employee engagement surv, Employee onboarding | |
| Template or tool | 26 | 13 | 2026-09-29 | Employee onboarding | |
| News or press | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-05-04 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Customer success stories case study
- 2026-09-29Employee team chat app blog
- 2026-09-29Employee voice video calls app blog
- 2026-09-29Employee time off app blog
- 2026-09-29Employee shift scheduling app blog
- 2026-09-29Employee clock in app blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pebb.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name workforce scheduling (178); 0 name the category the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pebb
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pebb is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pebb is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The all-in-one employee platform uniting people, work, and culture.
- For
- organizations at any scale
- Price stated
- 0 pebb.io
- Starting price
- 0 pebb.io
- Free plan or trial
- Get Started For Free pebb.io
- Integrations claimed
- 50 pebb.io
- Certifications
- SOC2GDPR
- Hosting
- United States
- Not stated on the pages read
- Customers
What Pebb's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pebb.io, pebb.io/pricing, pebb.io/Security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pebb's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pebb, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pebb by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pebb is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pebb, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.