Every category where a model named Oak Engage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	24 of 86	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	26 of 106	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oak Engage held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Internal communications · by segment

Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

6%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 15 → 5 of 83

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 22 → 25 of 83

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 25 of 87

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Internal communications	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 22 → 24 of 86
Frontline employee apps	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 41 → 26 of 106

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oak Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best suited for organizations that need one intranet platform for frontline, desk-based and remote employees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Oak Engage if you want to fix culture and ensure people are actually reading your messages.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative

“Jostle / Haystack / Oak Engage: good alternatives” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oak Engage, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oak Engage was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workvivo15 of 261Not among the top eight

Staffbase14 of 260Not among the top eight

Connecteam12 of 265Not among the top eight

Microsoft SharePoint12 of 260Not among the top eight

Simpplr11 of 262Not among the top eight

Jostle11 of 260Not among the top eight

LumApps8 of 260Not among the top eight

Happeo7 of 260Not among the top eight

Unily7 of 260Not among the top eight

Blink6 of 261Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oak Engage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Oak Engage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

oak.com25

peoplemanagingpeople.com19

g2.com13

guideflow.com13

workvivo.com13

learn.g2.com12

simpplr.com11

lumapps.com9

mangoapps.com9

staffbase.com9

No domain is on file for Oak Engage, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software12

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-202611

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-intranet-software-for-small-businesses10

g2.com/categories/employee-intranet9

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software9

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software8

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oak Engage stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“oak engage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 86 in internal communications

Segment leader

14%

Microsoft Teams

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Oak Engage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oak Engage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oak Engage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oak Engage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oak Engage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oak Engage, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.