Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 19% → 24%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 97, unchanged
1 category · RankedJobTarget
55Judge labels
24First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Job advertising for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of JobTarget →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 102
24%23 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 111
23%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise13 of 92
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named JobTarget for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 23% | 1 of 111 | 8% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 21% → 20%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, JobTarget held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Job advertising · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 21% → 20%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
20%from 21% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 1 of 103, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 19 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 21% | 20% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 21% → 20%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated JobTarget across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated JobTarget across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels3
Paraphrase11 labels6
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained21 labels14
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Highly geared toward mid-market teams managing 15 to 50 concurrent openings, offering flexible budgeting and unified analytics.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · scale prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation is JobTarget, especially if you hire steadily and want job distribution with budget optimization” GPT-6 Luna · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“JobTarget stands out as the best programmatic job advertising platform for companies with limited budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“the current AI-model consensus for mid-market B2B is JobTarget, with Joveo as contested alternative” Muse Glimmer 30B · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“best overall for automated programmatic distribution plus attribution-ready reporting, but it is generally more oriented to larger teams” Muse Glimmer 30B · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative
“may overkill pricing/setup for most SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JobTarget, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JobTarget was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JobTarget, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JobTarget was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JobTarget. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 55 answers that named JobTarget and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
jobtarget.comYour site38
guideflow.com32
g2.com27
selectsoftwarereviews.com27
joveo.com23
softwarefinder.com22
worldmetrics.org21
cxeverywhere.com16
gitnux.org16
hyring.com16
200 of the 238 domain citations in answers naming JobTarget came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where JobTarget stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where JobTarget stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “job advertising platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “programmatic job advertising platform”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“jobtarget”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 50 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 104,080 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 36,361 · 28 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,921
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
23%
rank 1 of 111 in job advertising
First choices
24
across its categories
- Named in
- 55 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 55 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jobtarget.com
10,034
subdomains included
Content
282
counted in the table below
Documentation
151
Product · Integration
3 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 207 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | Applicant tracking syste, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Report or ebook | 18 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 8 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | 2 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-27Press brake operator weekend shift tualatin oregon news or press
- 2026-09-25Routing scheduler browns summit north carolina conference or event
- 2026-09-24Small business recruiting software blog
- 2026-09-23Remote booking and travel support specialist fort worth texas report or ebook
- 2026-09-22Inside jobtarget a conversation with shravanthi reddy chinthakuntla executive director platform experience blog
- 2026-09-22All in one recruitment advertising platform blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jobtarget.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as JobTarget
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JobTarget; a claim can dispute any of them.
JobTarget (Programmatic+) 2JobTarget (specifically JobTarget360) 1JobTarget/Talroo 1
Follow JobTarget
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
JobTarget is its own company.ShowHide
The company
JobTarget is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- JobTarget helps you cut through the noise to reach and convert the best candidates. Our unified platform uses data and automated technology to help you efficiently manage applications and connect with quality talent - regardless of which recruitment systems you already use.
- For
- Employers
- Price stated
- No platform access fees. jobtarget.com/employers/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 80 jobtarget.com
- Certifications
- OFCCP compliant
- Customers named
- Dynamic SystemsN8tive SynergyPark Energy Services
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What JobTarget's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jobtarget.com, jobtarget.com/jobs/jt-t66bc0viy3/pricing-analyst-wasilla-alaska, jobtarget.com/employers/compliance, jobtarget.com/employers/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JobTarget's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JobTarget, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JobTarget by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where JobTarget is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name JobTarget, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where JobTarget is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where JobTarget is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend JobTarget first in Job advertising and distribution this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.