Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 30 of 40, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedinterviewstream
11Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. interviewstream was named 5 times in Video interviewing, where Spark Hire led with 50%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 42
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 66
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise24 of 40
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named interviewstream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 2% | 10 of 66 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, interviewstream held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 9 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 13 → 23 of 38
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated interviewstream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated interviewstream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Spark Hire or InterviewStream” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · direct prompt · first choice
“InterviewStream and BarRaiser focus on structured live interviews” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · alternative
“3. Interviewstream — Best All-in-One Solution” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative
“Simple hybrid live + prerecorded: InterviewStream” GPT-5.4 mini · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as interviewstream, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and interviewstream was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as interviewstream, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and interviewstream was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named interviewstream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 11 answers that named interviewstream and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hirevire.com7
sparkhire.com7
willo.video6
hiretruffle.com4
jazzhr.com4
hirevue.com3
interviewstream.comYour site3
noon.ai3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
pin.com3
Forty of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming interviewstream came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
interviewstream.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, interviewstream takes 2% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
interviewstream.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, interviewstream takes 2% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
6
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
8
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“interviewstream”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,870 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,005 · 29 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,095
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on interviewstream.com
705
subdomains included
Content
655
counted in the table below
Documentation
9
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 536 | 4 | 2026-09-17 | Video interviewing, Interview scheduling | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 45 | 0 | 2025-12-12 | Interview scheduling, Video interviewing | |
| Report or ebook | 29 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | Video interviewing, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 13 | 0 | 2014-10-07 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-06 | Video interviewing | |
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2021-04-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Clearing up video interview terminology blog
- 2026-09-10Workforce scalability blueprint blog
- 2026-08-279 signs your hiring is better blog
- 2026-08-19Guide to structured interviews blog
- 2026-07-24Hiring experience report 2026 report or ebook
- 2026-06-26Lean ta team playbook blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page interviewstream.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as interviewstream
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as interviewstream; a claim can dispute any of them.
InterviewStream 3Interviewstream 1
Follow interviewstream
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
interviewstream is its own company.ShowHide
The company
interviewstream is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Video Interviewing, Interview Scheduling, & AI Hiring Tools
- For
- HR teams
- Customers named
- BeallsNew Caney ISDColonial LifeEast Baton Rouge SchoolsCobb County School DistrictExtraco BanksNew Caney Independent School DistrictTigard-Tualatin School District
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What interviewstream's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: interviewstream.com, interviewstream.com/company/security, interviewstream.com/resources/case-studies, interviewstream.com/resources/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when interviewstream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as interviewstream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for interviewstream by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where interviewstream is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name interviewstream, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.