Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 47 of 93, unchanged
iCIMS Internal Mobility
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. iCIMS Internal Mobility was named 1 time in Internal talent marketpl, where Fuel50 led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market59 of 102
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise74 of 86
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named iCIMS Internal Mobility for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 59 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, iCIMS Internal Mobility held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 63 of 76, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 59 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated iCIMS Internal Mobility across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated iCIMS Internal Mobility across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“iCIMS Internal Mobility (Best if Already Using iCIMS)” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iCIMS Internal Mobility, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iCIMS Internal Mobility was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iCIMS Internal Mobility, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iCIMS Internal Mobility was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iCIMS Internal Mobility. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named iCIMS Internal Mobility and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
articsledge.com2
careerbird.ai1
christianandtimbers.com1
cotocus.com1
docebo.com1
engagedly.com1
gitnux.org1
gofigr.ai1
guideflow.com1
hiretruffle.com1
Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming iCIMS Internal Mobility came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
icims.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iCIMS Internal Mobility takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
icims.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iCIMS Internal Mobility takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent marketplaces”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “internal talent marketplace”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- icims.com shared with iCIMS's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,165,712 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 53,014 · 6,657 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 32,167
- Paid Google search
- 6 searches its ads show for, about 73 clicks and $5,674 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 59 of 102 in internal talent marketpl
Segment leader
47%
Fuel50
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow iCIMS Internal Mobility
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
iCIMS is the company behind iCIMS Internal Mobility.ShowHide
The company
iCIMS is the company behind iCIMS Internal Mobility.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from iCIMS
- iCIMS Attract, iCIMS Talent Cloud
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Proactively engage, retain and develop talent with an internal mobility and career growth solution.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What iCIMS Internal Mobility's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: icims.com/internal-hiring, icims.com/fr/internal-hiring, icims.com/en-gb/internal-hiring, icims.com/glossary/internal-recruiting, icims.com/fr/glossary/internal-recruiting. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iCIMS Internal Mobility's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iCIMS Internal Mobility, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iCIMS Internal Mobility by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iCIMS Internal Mobility is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iCIMS Internal Mobility, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.