Every category where a model named CultureMonkey for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	18 of 58	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, CultureMonkey held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Employee engagement surv · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 → 7 of 118

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 17 of 53

Enterprise▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 7% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 15 of 96

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Employee engagement surv	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 15 → 18 of 58

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated CultureMonkey across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best if you need global/distributed employee feedback, anonymous channels” Perplexity Sonar · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

“3. CultureMonkey - Employee engagement survey tools for mid-market companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

“best for enterprises with global and distributed teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Quantum Workplace or CultureMonkey for pure surveys” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CultureMonkey, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CultureMonkey was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Culture Amp16 of 256Not among the top eight

Workday Peakon Employee Voice11 of 255Not among the top eight

15Five Engage11 of 250Not among the top eight

Qualtrics EmployeeXM9 of 252Not among the top eight

Leapsome9 of 251Not among the top eight

Workleap Officevibe8 of 254Not among the top eight

FeedbackPulse7 of 251Not among the top eight

Lattice6 of 250Not among the top eight

Microsoft Viva Glint6 of 250Not among the top eight

Qualtrics XM4 of 252Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CultureMonkey. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named CultureMonkey and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

culturemonkey.ioYour site25

feedbackpulse.com17

capterra.com13

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

betterworks.com12

engagedly.com12

formgrid.com10

eletive.com6

hrcloud.com6

matterapp.com6

Ninety-five of the 120 domain citations in answers naming CultureMonkey came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

culturemonkey.io/employee-engagement/employee-engagement-survey-tools16

culturemonkey.io/guides/employee-engagement-survey-questions/employee-engagement-survey-ve14

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-employee-survey-software14

betterworks.com/magazine/best-employee-engagement-software12

capterra.com/resources/best-employee-engagement-software-reviews-analysis12

culturemonkey.io/employee-engagement/pulse-survey-tools11

formgrid.com/blog/employee-engagement-survey-tools10

engagedly.com/blog/best-employee-engagement-survey-softwares8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

culturemonkey.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CultureMonkey takes 0% of first choices and Culture Amp takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “engagement platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee engagement survey platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“culturemonkey”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 43,098 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 22,666 · 114 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,515
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $3 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

10 ads · 10 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2025, as CultureMonkey Private Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 10 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 18 of 58 in employee engagement surv

Segment leader

37%

Culture Amp

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on culturemonkey.io

1,672

subdomains included

Content

199

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

17 · 6

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Report or ebook	113	6	2026-08-20	Employee engagement surv, Employee onboarding
Comparison	32	8	2026-09-21	Employee engagement surv
Glossary or explainer	18	5	2026-07-01
Case study	13	2	2026-09-03
Template or tool	10	2	2026-08-26
Blog	8	0	2026-04-15	Applicant tracking syste
Conference or event	2	0	2025-03-06
Podcast or video	2	0	2025-02-20
News or press	1	0	2021-07-05

Most recent

2026-09-21Best anonymous reporting software comparison
2026-09-21Best candidate experience software comparison
2026-09-03Arrcs case study
2026-08-26Employee survey vendor security checklist template or tool
2026-08-25Weroad case study
2026-08-20Compare comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page culturemonkey.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow CultureMonkey

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CultureMonkey is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: CultureMonkey is a complete employee engagement platform.
culturemonkey.io
For: For people leaders at enterprise scale
culturemonkey.io
Price stated: Pricing is tiered by the size of your organization, and it is all-in: there is no separate platform or license fee on top of your plan. Onboarding, survey design help, and ongoing people-science advisory are included in the subscription. culturemonkey.io
Certifications: SOC 2ISO 27001GDPRSOC2ISO 27001 certifiedGDPR compliant
Hosting: USEU
Customers named: Aujan GroupMeridian Foods GroupRobertshawAstra Service PartnersCerence AILINKBANKUnited BankBeverly Wise
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What CultureMonkey's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: culturemonkey.io, culturemonkey.io/pricing, trust.culturemonkey.io, culturemonkey.io/features, culturemonkey.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CultureMonkey's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CultureMonkey, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CultureMonkey by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CultureMonkey is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CultureMonkey, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.