Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 23 of 76
3 categories · Named, not rankedClearCompany
11Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClearCompany was named 5 times in Performance management and 2 other categories, where Lattice led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market23 of 85
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 94
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ClearCompany for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 23 of 85 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 57 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 47 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ClearCompany held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Performance management · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 of 89, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 23 of 85 |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 95, unchanged |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 47 of 93 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ClearCompany across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ClearCompany across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“if you want simpler, faster deployment and your succession needs are basic” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative
“worth considering if you want ATS + performance management together” Perplexity Sonar · Performance management · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ClearCompany, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClearCompany was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ClearCompany, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClearCompany was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClearCompany. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named ClearCompany and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com5
betterworks.com4
forbes.com4
rippling.com4
workhuman.com4
asana.com3
hibob.com3
monday.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2
Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming ClearCompany came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on clearcompany.com
1,054
subdomains included
Content
840
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
20 · 103
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 626 | 18 | 2026-09-28 | Performance management, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Template or tool | 77 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | Skills intelligence, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Report or ebook | 53 | undated | Employee onboarding, Performance management | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 27 | 1 | 2026-07-07 | Performance management, Learning management syst | |
| Case study | 26 | 0 | 2026-05-12 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 0 | 2026-02-18 | Compensation management, AI recruiting assistants | |
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2025-07-31 | Applicant tracking syste, Performance management | |
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2025-06-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-285 things holding back hiring pipeline recfest blog
- 2026-09-24Talent management technology value matrix leader blog
- 2026-09-17Redthread people analytics technology report 2026 blog
- 2026-09-08Best talent acquisition software blog
- 2026-09-01Agile recruiting agentic ai blog
- 2026-08-26Questions to ask hr tech vendors flexibility blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page clearcompany.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ClearCompany
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ClearCompany is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ClearCompany is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise Talent Management Software; AI-powered platform that unifies hiring, onboarding, performance, and development; the unified talent platform for hiring, growth, and retention.
- For
- HR and business leaders; HR teams
- Customers named
- 3LS SolutionsPediatric Home ServiceECSPegasus Senior Living
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What ClearCompany's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: clearcompany.com, clearcompany.com/pricing, clearcompany.com/capabilities, clearcompany.com/topics/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClearCompany's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClearCompany, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClearCompany by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ClearCompany is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClearCompany, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.