Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 44 → 32 of 58
2 categories · RankedQuantive
70Judge labels
0First choices
21Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Goals and OKRs for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 68 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Quantive →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business55 of 63
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market17 of 68
0%24 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise14 of 61
0%33 labels
criticized challenger
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Quantive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 17 of 68 | 29% | 24 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 21 of 85 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Quantive held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 15 of 62
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 10 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 17 of 68 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Quantive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Quantive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase13 labelsNone
Comparative18 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative15 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Quantive: Offers sophisticated standalone OKR features with good data integrations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · first choice
“If you are scaling fast/Sales heavy: Use gtmhub.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice
“Other options include Gtmhub, which offers a free tier for up to 5 users and data connectors for real-time KPI syncing.” Llama 4 Maverick · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
“If your strategy is OKR‑centric and you want performance tightly tied to strategic objectives: Quantive.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Performance management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Acquired by WorkBoard (May 2025), discontinued as standalone ... not viable for new purchases” Kimi K2 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
“acquired by WorkBoard in May 2025, and its standalone platform is no longer sold” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“don’t evaluate it as a standalone current product. WorkBoard acquired Quantive” GPT-6 Luna · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
“Standalone Gtmhub/Quantive no longer exists.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quantive, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantive was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quantive, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantive was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quantive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 70 answers that named Quantive and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tability.io40
okrstool.com37
mooncamp.com36
workboard.com30
profit.co28
guideflow.com23
peoplemanagingpeople.com21
betterworks.com18
resources.rework.com18
okrinstitute.org16
267 of the 267 domain citations in answers naming Quantive came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
quantive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quantive takes 0% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
quantive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quantive takes 0% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “okr software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 49,500 a month (“quantive”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- · in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,899
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 70 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 61 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on quantive.com
508
subdomains included
Content
451
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
22 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 233 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | Goals and OKRs, Performance management | |
| Podcast or video | 121 | undated | Goals and OKRs, Performance management | ||
| News or press | 50 | 0 | 2025-05-27 | ||
| Case study | 28 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2025-01-12 | Goals and OKRs | |
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-23Agent driven strategy execution blog
- 2026-03-17Ai agents for manager effectiveness blog
- 2026-01-072025 a year in review blog
- 2025-09-12Insights gartner chro executive summit conference or event
- 2025-06-18Ai in banking blog
- 2025-05-27Ai agents general availability news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page quantive.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Quantive
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quantive; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quantive (formerly Gtmhub) 7Gtmhub 4Quantive / Gtmhub 1gtmhub 1
Follow Quantive
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Quantive is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Quantive is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Native strategy execution & OKR platform
- For
- Enterprise
- Customers named
- GHXMagnum Ice Cream
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Quantive's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: quantive.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quantive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Quantive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quantive, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.