AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Buddy Punch · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Buddy Punch

64Judge labels
7First choices
14Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Time and attendance for small business buyers
Rank 19 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Buddy Punch →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Buddy Punch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Time and attendanceCore HR and payroll0%19 of 869%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll0%68 of 7850%2under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Employee monitoringWorkforce planning and analytics0%62 of 75100%1under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll0%42 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
People analyticsWorkforce planning and analytics0%88 of 114100%1under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%

Movement

Since September 2026, Buddy Punch held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Time and attendance · by segment

Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 9 of 54
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 19 of 77
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Time and attendance2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 19 of 86
Workforce management sui0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 68 of 78, unchanged
Employee monitoring0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 62 of 75, unchanged
Leave0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 29 → 42 of 95
People analytics0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 88 of 114, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Buddy Punch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502103
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels3
Paraphrase9 labels4
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Easy setup, geofencing, facial recognition, G2 awards for usability/relationship. Affordable.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative
“Buddy Punch, TSheets, or ClockIn: These typically start at $2-5 per employee per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative
“Best-in-class time + scheduling | Deputy, Buddy Punch, TCP (TimeClock Plus)” Kimi K2 · Time and attendance · scale prompt · alternative
“Buddy Punch combines time off management with advanced scheduling” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"Products like Homebase, When I Work, or Buddy Punch may claim "enterprise" features but lack the fundamentals"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reported issues with customer support responsiveness ... Hidden fees or unclear pricing structures” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Treat those as enhanced-due-diligence flags, not a finding that each vendor broke the law” GPT-6 Luna · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“Specific Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Buddy Punch” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Buddy Punch, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Buddy Punch was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Connecteam39 of 644Not among the top eight
Homebase34 of 6412Not among the top eight
Deputy27 of 640Not among the top eight
QuickBooks Time26 of 641Not among the top eight
When I Work24 of 641Not among the top eight
Clockify18 of 644Not among the top eight
Jibble14 of 646Not among the top eight
ADP Workforce Now13 of 640Not among the top eight
OnTheClock8 of 641Not among the top eight
Hubstaff8 of 640Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Buddy Punch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 64 answers that named Buddy Punch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com31
joinhomebase.com30
peoplemanagingpeople.com26
buddypunch.comYour site23
guideflow.com23
timetrex.com21
apps365.com16
firsthr.app16
g2.com15
jibble.io15

193 of the 216 domain citations in answers naming Buddy Punch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

buddypunch.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Buddy Punch takes 0% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “time and attendance system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “time and attendance systems”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
9,900 a month (“buddy punch”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
48 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 39,250 a month
Searches its site ranks for
10,824 · 69 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,434
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
27 ads · 18 text, 5 image, 4 video · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as Buddy Punch, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 15 before. 8 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
64 answers
Its own site cited
in 63 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on buddypunch.com
888
subdomains included
Content
218
counted in the table below
Documentation
550
Product · Integration
10 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog181102026-09-23Payroll software, Workforce scheduling
Comparison2632026-07-08
Case study6undated
Template or tool3undated
Report or ebook1undated
Glossary or explainer112026-08-11
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page buddypunch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Buddy Punch

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Buddy Punch is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Buddy Punch is affordable and easy to use employee time tracking, scheduling, and payroll software that simplifies team management for businesses of all sizes.
For
businesses whose hourly employees work in more than one place
Price stated
Billed Monthly / Billed Annually (Save up to 18%) buddypunch.com/pricing
Starting price
4.99 buddypunch.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try for Free buddypunch.com
Customers named
Heart ValleyHealthtreeRumble BoxingCoast to Coast TransportersCosmick TechnologiesLeete Tire & Auto CenterFarmers Insurance
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What Buddy Punch's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: buddypunch.com, buddypunch.com/pricing, buddypunch.com/security, buddypunch.com/time-clock-software/features, buddypunch.com/time-clock-software/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Buddy Punch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Buddy Punch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Buddy Punch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Buddy Punch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Buddy Punch, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at buddypunch.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.