| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 19 of 86 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 68 of 78 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 62 of 75 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 42 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 88 of 114 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 19 of 86 |
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 78, unchanged |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 75, unchanged |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 42 of 95 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 88 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Easy setup, geofencing, facial recognition, G2 awards for usability/relationship. Affordable.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative
“Buddy Punch, TSheets, or ClockIn: These typically start at $2-5 per employee per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative
“Best-in-class time + scheduling | Deputy, Buddy Punch, TCP (TimeClock Plus)” Kimi K2 · Time and attendance · scale prompt · alternative
“Buddy Punch combines time off management with advanced scheduling” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Products like Homebase, When I Work, or Buddy Punch may claim "enterprise" features but lack the fundamentals"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reported issues with customer support responsiveness ... Hidden fees or unclear pricing structures” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Treat those as enhanced-due-diligence flags, not a finding that each vendor broke the law” GPT-6 Luna · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“Specific Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Buddy Punch” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 64 answers that named Buddy Punch and are not a share of its labels.
193 of the 216 domain citations in answers naming Buddy Punch came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 181 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | Payroll software, Workforce scheduling | |
| Comparison | 26 | 3 | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-11 |
Every page buddypunch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Buddy Punch's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: buddypunch.com, buddypunch.com/pricing, buddypunch.com/security, buddypunch.com/time-clock-software/features, buddypunch.com/time-clock-software/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Buddy Punch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Buddy Punch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Buddy Punch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: