Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
Braintrust · 2 categories · Named, not rankedBraintrust AIR
7Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Braintrust AIR was named 4 times in Video interviewing and 1 other category, where Spark Hire led with 50%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market19 of 66
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 40
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Braintrust AIR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 19 of 66 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 28 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Braintrust AIR held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 29 → 19 of 63
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 33 of 38, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 19 of 66 |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Braintrust AIR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Braintrust AIR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Willo, Hireflix, VidCruiter, or Braintrust AIR, which get better candidate feedback for ease and fairness” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · negative prompt · alternative
“Other options to consider are Braintrust AIR, AI Interviewer, and HireVue” Llama 4 Maverick · Technical hiring assessm · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Braintrust AIR, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Braintrust AIR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Braintrust AIR, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Braintrust AIR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Braintrust AIR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Braintrust AIR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com5
capterra.com4
selectsoftwarereviews.com4
g2.com3
hiretruffle.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
softwareadvice.com3
hiringmanager.net2
intervue.io2
jobma.com2
Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Braintrust AIR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
usebraintrust.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Braintrust AIR takes 0% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
usebraintrust.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Braintrust AIR takes 0% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- usebraintrust.com shared with Braintrust's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,778 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,311 · 78 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,193
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown September 2026, as WeFuse (Pty) Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Braintrust AIR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Braintrust is the company behind Braintrust AIR.ShowHide
The company
Braintrust is the company behind Braintrust AIR.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Recruiter platform; AI recruiting & interview software; conversational AI voice interviews
- For
- enterprise teams
- Price stated
- Free trial available. Enterprise pricing on request. usebraintrust.com/air-release-notes
- Starting price
- 0 usebraintrust.com/air-release-notes
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial available usebraintrust.com/air-release-notes
- Integrations claimed
- 50 usebraintrust.com/products/air
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Certified
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting, customers
What Braintrust AIR's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: usebraintrust.com/air-release-notes, usebraintrust.com/how-braintrust-air-stays-compliant, usebraintrust.com/refer/air, usebraintrust.com/products/air, docs.usebraintrust.com/communitydocs/braintrust-ai-competition-and-showcase-event. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Braintrust AIR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Braintrust AIR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Braintrust AIR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Braintrust AIR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Braintrust AIR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.