Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 of 62, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedWrike
8Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wrike was named 5 times in Goals and OKRs and 1 other category, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market26 of 68
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise39 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Wrike for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 26 of 68 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 83 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Wrike held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 37 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 68, unchanged |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Wrike across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Wrike across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Wrike/ClickUp (if already in use)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · scale prompt · alternative
“Need PM + OKRs? → Wrike” MiniMax M2.5 · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Flexible but OKRs feel added-on.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wrike, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wrike was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wrike, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wrike was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wrike. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Wrike and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
meetingnotes.com4
airfocus.com3
ones.com3
onstrategyhq.com3
teamhood.com3
180ops.com2
capterra.com2
clickup.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Wrike came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wrike.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Wrike takes 0% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wrike.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Wrike takes 0% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “okr software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 27,100 a month (“wrike”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 623 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 703,499 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 50,414 · 3,904 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 23,552
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 1,931 clicks and $21,691 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on wrike.com
6,009
subdomains included
Content
2,517
counted in the table below
Documentation
331
Product · Integration
51 · 59
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,335 | 2 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 422 | 0 | 2025-04-24 | ||
| News or press | 224 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 169 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 99 | 0 | 2018-10-30 | ||
| Case study | 88 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 87 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 75 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 16 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2022-06-21 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10How an ai agent protects deep work for one creative team blog
- 2026-09-03Airtable alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-05Collaborate 2026 blog
- 2026-05-22Hive alternatives comparison
- 2025-08-12Ai agents in project management blog
- 2025-04-24What is an action plan with example glossary or explainer
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 21, 2026User group experience with Wrike in MelbourneGTP Space&Co 530 Colines Lvl 3, 530 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Melbourne · hosts
As the event pages on wrike.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page wrike.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Wrike
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Wrike is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Wrike is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered enterprise work management software
- For
- enterprise
- Price stated
- Free $0 user/month; Team $10 user/month; Business $25 user/month; Pinnacle Contact us; Apex Contact us wrike.com/marketing/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 wrike.com/marketing/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Wrike for free wrike.com
- Integrations claimed
- 400 wrike.com
- Certifications
- SOC2 Type IIISO 27001:2013ISO 27018:2019CSA STAREU & US and Swiss & US Privacy Shield-certifiedGDPR-compliantCCPA-compliantAICPA
- Hosting
- San Jose, CaliforniaAmsterdam, the Netherlands
- Customers named
- OglivySiemensTmobileAvevaLyftSchneider ElectricAbbNVIDIA
What Wrike's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wrike.com, wrike.com/marketing/pricing, wrike.com/security, wrike.com/use-cases, wrike.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wrike's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wrike, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wrike by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Wrike is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wrike, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.