Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 of 76, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedWorkhuman Conversations
2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workhuman Conversations was named 2 times in Performance management and 1 other category, where Lattice led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market12 of 85
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workhuman Conversations for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 2% | 12 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 55 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workhuman Conversations held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Performance management · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance management | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 85, unchanged |
| 360 feedback | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 73, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workhuman Conversations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workhuman Conversations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Workhuman Conversations - a full continuous performance suite built for mid-market and enterprise organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Performance management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workhuman Conversations, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workhuman Conversations was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workhuman Conversations, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workhuman Conversations was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workhuman Conversations. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Workhuman Conversations and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
betterworks.com2
workhuman.comYour site2
capterra.com1
dataintelo.com1
effy.ai1
feedbackpulse.com1
getapp.com1
getapp.ie1
hibob.com1
hrtechsaas.com1
Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Workhuman Conversations came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workhuman.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workhuman Conversations takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 43%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workhuman.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workhuman Conversations takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 43%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “performance management software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “performance management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 373,538 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 29,311 · 3,739 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,539
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 1,763 clicks and $160,162 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 85 in performance management
Segment leader
43%
Lattice
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workhuman.com
941
subdomains included
Content
845
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
12 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 690 | undated | Performance management, People analytics | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 61 | undated | |||
| Case study | 33 | undated | Recognition and rewards | ||
| Comparison | 22 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 19 | 1 | 2026-10-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-20Workhuman Forum Paris 2026 conference or event
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 20, 2026Workhuman Forum Paris 2026Paris Convention Centre, Paris, France · hosts
- April 26, 2027 to April 29, 2027Workhuman LiveNashville · hosts
As the event pages on workhuman.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workhuman.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Workhuman Conversations
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workhuman Conversations is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Workhuman Conversations is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Conversations® combines agile performance development with structured feedback and assessments to create a culture of connection, continuous feedback, and growth.
- For
- managers
- Integrations claimed
- 2 workhuman.com/why-workhuman/case-studies
- Customers named
- QlikFirst Tech
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What Workhuman Conversations's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: workhuman.com/platform/conversations, workhuman.com, workhuman.com/platform, workhuman.com/why-workhuman/case-studies, workhuman.com/capabilities/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workhuman Conversations's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workhuman Conversations, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workhuman Conversations by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workhuman Conversations is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workhuman Conversations, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.