Every category where a model named Engagedly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	11%	2 of 102	0%	17	accepted challenger	▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	11%	2 of 93	0%	17	accepted challenger	▼−7Since September 2026: 17% → 10%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	2%	13 of 90	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	12 of 58	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	16 of 85	0%	11	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	0%	17 of 73	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	22 of 68	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	42 of 127	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	43 of 114	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	60 of 98	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Engagedly held within the floor in all ten categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

3%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 12 of 125, unchanged

Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

12%from 9% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 93

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 → 17 of 76

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Succession planning	17%	10%	▼−7Since September 2026: 17% → 10%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 2 of 93, unchanged
Internal talent marketpl	9%	12%	▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 3 → 2 of 102
Employee engagement surv	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 18 → 12 of 58
Talent intelligence	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 26 → 13 of 90
Performance management	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 20 → 16 of 85
360 feedback	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 21 → 17 of 73
Goals and OKRs	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 35 → 22 of 68
Skills intelligence	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 39 → 42 of 127
People analytics	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 43 of 114, unchanged
Recognition and rewards	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 31 → 60 of 98

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Engagedly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	6	0	7
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	4
Mistral Small	3	0	2	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	2	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	4	2	7
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	3	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	7	2	11
MiniMax M2.5	1	5	1	7
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	3	3	8

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct29 labels7

Paraphrase35 labels5

Comparative20 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels2

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative107 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid-Market Sweet Spot: Look at platforms like Engagedly (which integrates performance, succession, and readiness-driven mobility for the 500+ segment)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · scale prompt · first choice

“Engagedly is the most recommended due to its comprehensive features for talent mobility, succession planning, and AI-driven matching” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Engagedly and Lattice are the best overall choices due to their strong feature sets, ease of use, and mid-market focus.” Mistral Small · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice

“if you want a single best default, Engagedly is the better fit for succession planning plus talent mobility” Perplexity Sonar · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Engagedly, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Engagedly was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice46 of 10718Compare →

Leapsome32 of 1072Compare →

Eightfold AI30 of 1072Compare →

15Five27 of 1071Not among the top eight

Fuel5023 of 10713Compare →

Gloat23 of 1072Not among the top eight

Culture Amp19 of 1072Not among the top eight

Betterworks17 of 1073Not among the top eight

Phenom15 of 1070Compare →

BambooHR14 of 1073Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Engagedly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 107 of the 107 answers that named Engagedly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

engagedly.comYour site84

peoplemanagingpeople.com43

workhuman.com40

guideflow.com39

firsthr.app30

betterworks.com27

gartner.com22

skillpanel.com22

sprad.io22

talentguard.com22

267 of the 351 domain citations in answers naming Engagedly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

engagedly.com/blog/best-talent-mobility-softwares31

engagedly.com/blog/best-succession-planning-softwares22

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools14

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software14

engagedly.com/blog/best-eightfold-alternatives-talent-mobility13

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces13

workhuman.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-tools13

guideflow.com/blog/internal-mobility-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

engagedly.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Engagedly takes 11% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “talent marketplaces”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “internal talent marketplace”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“engagedly”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 47,955 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 18,220 · 258 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,814
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

18 ads · 9 text, 7 image, 2 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as Engagedly Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 17 in the year, 1 before. 16 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

11%

rank 2 of 102 in internal talent marketpl

Segment leader

47%

Fuel50

First choices: 15 across its categories
Named in: 107 answers
Its own site cited: in 107 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on engagedly.com

4,029

subdomains included

Content

2,014

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,498

Product · Integration

74 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,566	43	2026-09-28	Performance management, 360 feedback
Glossary or explainer	93	5	2026-08-20	Performance management, 360 feedback
Podcast or video	92	1	2026-08-28	Succession planning
Comparison	77	23	2026-09-03	Learning experience plat, Performance management
Report or ebook	50	1	2026-09-16	Performance management
Webinar or virtual event	44	0	2026-06-09	Performance management
News or press	34	0	2021-08-30	Performance management
Case study	33	7	2026-09-03	Performance management
Template or tool	19	3	2026-09-08	Performance management, 360 feedback
Conference or event	6	0	2022-06-17

Most recent

2026-09-28Best 360 degree feedback software for manufacturing companies blog
2026-09-28Engagedly announces its tenth annual top 100 hr influencers blog
2026-09-23Performance management software for manufacturing blog
2026-09-22Employee survey guide blog
2026-09-21Engagedly website components preview blog
2026-09-16State of performance management report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page engagedly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Engagedly

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Engagedly is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Talent Management Software for High Performing Teams; a comprehensive AI talent management Software built for HR leaders to grow high-performing teams and drive better employee engagement; AI talent management platform
engagedly.com
For: HR leaders; HR professionals; organizations
engagedly.com
Price stated: Pricing engagedly.com
Customers named: AltisourceCoupaHIMSSRudolph and SlettenActifioThe Cookware Company Asia LtdGray, Gray & GrayArcher Mechanical Inc
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Engagedly's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: engagedly.com, trust.engagedly.com, engagedly.com/product, engagedly.com/resources/case-studies, engagedly.com/resources/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Engagedly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Engagedly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Engagedly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Engagedly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Engagedly, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Engagedly is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Internal talent marketplace

Engagedly is among the products AI models recommend first in Internal talent marketplace this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/engagedly--internal-talent-marketplace-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Internal talent marketplace, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Internal talent marketplace standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/engagedly--internal-talent-marketplace-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Internal talent marketplace, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Internal talent marketplace standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/engagedly--internal-talent-marketplace-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Internal talent marketplace, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Internal talent marketplace standing, where the claim can be checked.

Succession planning

Engagedly is among the products AI models recommend first in Succession planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/succession-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/engagedly--succession-planning-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Succession planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Succession planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/succession-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/engagedly--succession-planning-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Succession planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Succession planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/succession-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/engagedly--succession-planning-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Succession planning, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Succession planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.