Small business=heldSince September 2026: 6% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 4 of 95, unchanged
Conexis · 2 categories · RankedConexis VMS
30Judge labels
9First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Contingent workforce man for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 121 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Conexis VMS →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 101
9%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 121
7%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise28 of 83
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Conexis VMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 7% | 7 of 121 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 51 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Conexis VMS held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Contingent workforce man · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 of 111, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 → 25 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingent workforce man | 7% | 8% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 7 of 121 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Conexis VMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Conexis VMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labels6
Scale-constrained6 labels2
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Conexis VMS stands out as the best vendor management system (VMS) option for managing contingent workers” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-Market / Agile VMS (e.g., Worksuite, TalentDesk, Conexis)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · scale prompt · first choice
“Best Overall (Transparent, Low Cost): Conexis VMS” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market Programs on a Budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Conexis VMS, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conexis VMS was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Conexis VMS, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conexis VMS was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conexis VMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Conexis VMS and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
conexisvmssoftware.comYour site14
rfp.wiki12
capterra.com11
gitnux.org11
peoplemanagingpeople.com10
talentdesk.io10
g2.com9
hrtechsaas.com9
itechguides.com9
ramp.com9
Ninety of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Conexis VMS came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
conexisvmssoftware.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Conexis VMS takes 7% of first choices and VectorVMS takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
conexisvmssoftware.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Conexis VMS takes 7% of first choices and VectorVMS takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contingent workforce platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “vendor management system for contingent workers”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“conexis vms”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- conexisvmssoftware.com shared with Conexis's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,153 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 294 · 24 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 645
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown September 2025, as Wayne Burgess, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 7 of 121 in contingent workforce man
Segment leader
16%
VectorVMS
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Conexis VMS
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Conexis VMS; a claim can dispute any of them.
Conexis 5
Follow Conexis VMS
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Conexis is the company behind Conexis VMS.ShowHide
The company
Conexis is the company behind Conexis VMS.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an easy-to-use cloud and web-based vendor management system (VMS) that automates and consolidates the management of staffing agencies and non-employee workforce processes
- For
- companies with any size contingent workforce budget
- Price stated
- range of pricing options conexisvmssoftware.com/conexis-vms-faqs
- Starting price
- $1m to $10m conexisvmssoftware.com/conexis-vms-faqs
- Free plan or trial
- free demo today conexisvmssoftware.com/conexis-vms-faqs
- Certifications
- SOCII
- Hosting
- USACanada
- Customers named
- North American Pharmaceutical CompanyGlobal Consumer Products CompanyNational US RetailerGlobal Pharmaceutical Company
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Conexis VMS's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: conexisvmssoftware.com/conexis-vms-faqs, conexisvmssoftware.com/vms-for-procurement, conexisvmssoftware.com/partner-with-conexis-vms, conexisvmssoftware.com/contingent-workforce-vms, conexisvmssoftware.com/vms-for-talent-acquisition. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conexis VMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conexis VMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conexis VMS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Conexis VMS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conexis VMS, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.