Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 20% → 15%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 → 4 of 60
2 categories · RankedPrimalogik
63Judge labels
8First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in 360 feedback for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Primalogik →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 63
13%41 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market10 of 73
2%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise63 of 69
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In 360 feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Primalogik for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 2% | 10 of 73 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 28 of 85 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Primalogik held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · 360 feedback · by segment
Mid-market▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 3 → 10 of 69
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 45 → 54 of 59
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | 10% | 2% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 10 of 73 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 28 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Primalogik across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Primalogik across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels5
Comparative14 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Primalogik offers the best value for money with full 360-degree feedback capabilities at the lowest price point for small businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice
“Primalogik is also a strong contender if you need a more comprehensive performance management suite at a low per-user cost.” Mistral Small · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative
“Primalogik and PerformYard are still relatively low-cost, but they are more expensive than the cheapest tools” Perplexity Sonar · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative
“Primalogik ($3–$6/user/month) offer solid features with predictable, low pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Primalogik, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Primalogik was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Primalogik, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Primalogik was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Primalogik. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named Primalogik and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workhuman.com50
betterworks.com48
feedbackpulse.com43
firsthr.app43
teamflect.com37
peoplemanagingpeople.com33
charliehr.com25
nanoglobals.com25
effy.ai24
intervue.io23
351 of the 351 domain citations in answers naming Primalogik came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
primalogik.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Primalogik takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
primalogik.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Primalogik takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “360 feedback tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “360-degree feedback tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“primalogik”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,664 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,703 · 118 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 974
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 73 in 360 feedback
Segment leader
34%
Lattice
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on primalogik.com
521
subdomains included
Content
291
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 271 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | Performance management, 360 feedback | |
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | Performance management, 360 feedback | ||
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2024-03-21 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | 360 feedback | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2021-03-26 | Performance management |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22When small business needs performance management software blog
- 2026-08-19How to avoid manager burnout blog
- 2026-08-05Continuous performance management software managers blog
- 2026-07-22Best practices for using performance rating scales blog
- 2026-07-1631 questions for a well designed employee survey blog
- 2026-07-08Meaningful work blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page primalogik.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Primalogik
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Primalogik is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Primalogik is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Employee performance management software
- For
- HR professionals
- Price stated
- Affordable pricing primalogik.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial primalogik.com
- Customers named
- DuckeriStreamPlanet Co., LLCSensiba San Filippo LLCIstationVanillaSoftEndeavor RoboticsKinsa Health
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Primalogik's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: primalogik.com, primalogik.com/pricing, primalogik.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Primalogik's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Primalogik, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Primalogik by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Primalogik is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Primalogik, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.