Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 19 of 58
2 categories · Named, not rankedSynergita
18Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Synergita was named 3 times in Goals and OKRs and 1 other category, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 63
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 68
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise58 of 61
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Synergita for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 23 of 68 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 51 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Synergita held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 21 of 62
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 49 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 23 of 68 |
| 360 feedback | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 73, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Synergita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Synergita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Use ... Synergita (for cheap $3/user cascading goals)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
“one of the most affordable options for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Synergita, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Synergita was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Synergita, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Synergita was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Synergita. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Synergita and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
synergita.comYour site11
tability.io11
okrstool.com10
mooncamp.com7
teamflect.com7
firsthr.app6
ones.com6
guideflow.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
resources.rework.com5
Sixty-two of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Synergita came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
synergita.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Synergita takes 0% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
synergita.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Synergita takes 0% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “okr software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“synergita”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,041 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,486 · 59 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 937
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on synergita.com
975
subdomains included
Content
919
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
5 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 759 | 26 | 2026-09-24 | Performance management, Goals and OKRs | |
| Report or ebook | 39 | 0 | 2024-11-04 | Performance management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 30 | undated | Performance management | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 2 | 2026-09-21 | Performance management, Goals and OKRs | |
| Podcast or video | 22 | undated | Performance management | ||
| Case study | 21 | undated | Performance management | ||
| News or press | 14 | 0 | 2024-05-24 | Performance management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | Performance management | |
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | Goals and OKRs | |
| Conference or event | 3 | 1 | 2026-08-11 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Role of ai in performance management blog
- 2026-09-21Okrs vs traditional goal setting whats the difference comparison
- 2026-09-14Okr software slack and microsoft teams integration blog
- 2026-09-10Okr adoption for global companies blog
- 2026-09-0910 examples of mission driven okrs in non profits blog
- 2026-09-07Best okr jira integration tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page synergita.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name performance management (109); 21 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Synergita
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Synergita is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Synergita is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Best OKR & Performance Management Software
- For
- employee data
- Price stated
- per-user, per-month subscription model, billed annually; transparent, tiered plans (OKR Starter, Lite, Growth; Perform Engage, Perform, Perform Plus) synergita.com
- Starting price
- $2 synergita.com/performance-management-software/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial synergita.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001 certified
- Customers named
- Hughes Systique Pvt LtdSea6 Energy Private LimitedCradleGlobal EdgeBankBazaar.comHomeTeamNSRialtoCompunnel Tech
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Synergita's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: synergita.com, synergita.com/performance-management-software/pricing, synergita.com/security, synergita.com/use-cases/ceo-and-okrs, synergita.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Synergita's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Synergita, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Synergita by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Synergita is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Synergita, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.