Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 of 91, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedSense
11Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sense was named 5 times in Recruitment marketing and 1 other category, where Teamtailor led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business41 of 99
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 104
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise23 of 78
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 34 of 104 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 80 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sense held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 → 58 of 94
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 23 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 34 of 104 |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Sense is best for candidate engagement and messaging automation, especially in staffing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“They require ongoing engagement and may not deliver value without a strong talent pool” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sense, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sense was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sense, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sense was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Sense and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com8
sprad.io8
joveo.com7
learn.g2.com7
webtonic.io7
hrtechsaas.com6
selectsoftwarereviews.com6
resources.rework.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
worldmetrics.org4
Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Sense came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sensehq.com
778
subdomains included
Content
492
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
40 · 57
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 301 | 0 | 2025-04-03 | Applicant tracking syste, Recruiting CRM | |
| Conference or event | 121 | undated | Applicant tracking syste, AI recruiting assistants | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | undated | |||
| Case study | 21 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 14 | 0 | 2025-04-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-04-03Templates blog
- 2025-04-03Candidate feedback email template template or tool
- 2025-04-03Candidate rejection after interview email template template or tool
- 2025-04-03Candidate skills assessment email templates template or tool
- 2025-04-03Email template for inviting candidates to apply template or tool
- 2025-04-03Employee referral email templates template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sensehq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Sense
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sense is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Sense is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Conversational AI platform for high-velocity hiring
- For
- talent acquisition teams; staffing teams; recruiters
- Integrations claimed
- 55 sensehq.com/marketplace
- Certifications
- PCI DSSSOC 1/2/3ITAREU-USNIST
- Customers named
- staffmarkTrilliumCOMPASSUSDELL TechnologiesHollstadt ConsultingDellCarvanaHealthCare Support
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Sense's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sensehq.com, sensehq.com/security, sensehq.com/product/nps, sensehq.com/customer-stories, sensehq.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sense, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.