Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 81 → 82 of 88
10 categories · RankedSAP
34Judge labels
0First choices
18Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
10Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Succession planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 84 of 93 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business83 of 91
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market84 of 93
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 84 of 93 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 59 of 61 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 53 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 115 of 148 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 125 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 101 of 121 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Frontline employee apps | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 57 of 106 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 119 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 0% | 109 of 136 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22% | |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 76 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP held within the floor in all ten categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 78 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 93, unchanged |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 59 of 61 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 88 → 53 of 114 |
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 115 of 148, unchanged |
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 168 → 125 of 140 |
| Contingent workforce man | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 101 of 121, unchanged |
| Frontline employee apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 106, unchanged |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 119 of 142, unchanged |
| Staffing agency tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 109 of 136, unchanged |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“beware of HR-suite-bundled LMSs if you care about actual learning outcomes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
“you likely don't have the dedicated team or budget for enterprise-level custom solutions (like Workday or SAP)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Staffing agency tools · scale prompt · soft negative
“likely don't have the dedicated technical resources to support heavy enterprise suites like Workday or SAP” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation management · scale prompt · soft negative
“without becoming overly complex or expensive like enterprise suites (e.g., Workday or SAP)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Succession planning · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 34 answers that named SAP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com8
guideflow.com8
selectsoftwarereviews.com8
hr-ai-index.com6
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
zipdo.co6
factorialhr.com5
forbes.com5
gitnux.org5
workhuman.com5
Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming SAP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“sap”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 74,309 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,214,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 113,777
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 84 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sap.com
20,663
subdomains included
Content
2,976
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,426
Product · Integration
1,660 · 3,500
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,797 | 92 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 677 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 183 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 146 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 98 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Submissions officially open 2027 sap innovation awards news or press
- 2026-09-28Coming soon customer influence feedback experience news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap nvidia openshell auditable ai agents enterprise systems news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap connect 2026 media analyst program news or press
- 2026-09-24Sap apphaus network partner bluestonex builds the bridge news or press
- 2026-09-24Autonomous enterprise podcast lesssons 16 executive conversations podcast or video
Events in person
Upcoming
- April 6, 2027 to April 8, 2027SAP ALM Summit North America 2027SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square, United States · hosts
As the event pages on sap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SAP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SAP is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Explore market-leading software and technology from SAP. Become an intelligent, sustainable enterprise with the best in cloud, platform, and sustainability solutions – no matter your industry or size.
- Customers named
- FreseniusMAHLEEdERSACamposol
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SAP's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com, sap.com/about/trust-center/security/cloud-erp-security.html, sap.com/products/a-z.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.