Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 70 → 53 of 54
Workday · 1 category · RankedWorkday Time Tracking
38Judge labels
3First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Time and attendance for enterprise buyers
Rank 24 of 86 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business56 of 57
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 86
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 87
5%24 labels
accepted challenger
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Time Tracking for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 24 of 86 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Time Tracking held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 → 25 of 77
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 4 of 76, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Time Tracking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Time Tracking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Global enterprise needing HR + Finance + Time in one → Workday” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Enterprise: ADP Workforce Now or Workday” MiniMax M2.5 · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“may be overkill for smaller teams because they often require higher implementation costs and dedicated administrators” Perplexity Sonar · Time and attendance · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Time Tracking, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Time Tracking was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Time Tracking, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Time Tracking was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Time Tracking. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 38 answers that named Workday Time Tracking and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com19
paylocity.com13
factorialhr.com12
learn.g2.com11
rippling.com11
gartner.com10
nowsta.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com10
selectsoftwarereviews.com10
paycor.com9
115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming Workday Time Tracking came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday Time Tracking stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday Time Tracking stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“workday time tracking”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 36 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday Time Tracking
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Time Tracking; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday 8
Follow Workday Time Tracking
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Time Tracking.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Time Tracking.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Personeelsmanagement draait om processen die de prestaties en productiviteit van de workforce maximaliseren.
- For
- HR-, finance- en operationele leaders
- Free plan or trial
- Voir la démo (2'20) workday.com/fr-fr/products/workforce-management/time.html
- Customers named
- PrimericaLand O'LakesLand O’Lakes
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday Time Tracking's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/nl-nl/topics/hr/workforce-management.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/workforce-management/time.html, workday.com/fr-fr/products/workforce-management/time.html, workday.com/es-es/products/workforce-management/time.html, workday.com/de-de/products/workforce-management/time.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Time Tracking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Time Tracking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Time Tracking by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Time Tracking is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Time Tracking, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.