Every category where a model named Oracle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	89 of 102	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	41 of 90	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	47 of 65	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40%
Benefits administration	Core HR and payroll	0%	50 of 67	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Gusto at 20%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Compensation benchmarking data	Compensation and total rewards	0%	106 of 148	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 19%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	55 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	70 of 85	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Staffing agency platforms	Talent acquisition	0%	105 of 136	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	92 of 98	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle held within the floor in all nine categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 70 of 125, unchanged

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 104 → 82 of 93

EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.

0%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Internal talent marketpl	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 104 → 89 of 102
Talent intelligence	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 41 of 90, unchanged
Applicant tracking syste	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 47 of 65, unchanged
Benefits administration	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 50 of 67, unchanged
Compensation benchmarkin	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 106 of 148, unchanged
Learning experience plat	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 55 of 89, unchanged
Performance management	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 70 of 85, unchanged
Staffing agency tools	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 105 of 136, unchanged
Workforce planning	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 92 of 98, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	3
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Eightfold / SAP / Oracle | Enterprise-only, custom quotes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · hard negative

“you likely aren't large enough to justify heavy enterprise suites like SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle without a massive budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Performance management · scale prompt · soft negative

“without the bureaucratic bloat and seven-figure price tag of enterprise giants like Workday or Oracle” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Staffing agency tools · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“you likely do not need the heavy, multi-million-dollar enterprise ERP modules (like SAP or Oracle)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP SuccessFactors10 of 440Not among the top eight

Workday10 of 440Not among the top eight

Anaplan9 of 441Not among the top eight

Rippling9 of 441Not among the top eight

Workday Adaptive Planning8 of 443Not among the top eight

SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning8 of 440Not among the top eight

Eightfold AI7 of 443Not among the top eight

ChartHop7 of 441Not among the top eight

UKG Pro6 of 441Not among the top eight

BambooHR6 of 440Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 44 answers that named Oracle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com13

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

g2.com8

gartner.com8

firsthr.app7

checkthat.ai5

effy.ai5

hrtechsaas.com5

intervue.io5

skima.ai5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Oracle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-planning-software6

firsthr.app/compare/core-hr/workforce-planning-software5

abacum.ai/blog/best-headcount-workforce-planning-software4

articsledge.com/post/workforce-planning-software3

compensationtools.net/best-pay-equity-software3

effy.ai/blog/pay-equity-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces3

intervue.io/blog/best-workforce-planning-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

oracle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Oracle takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “talent marketplaces”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “internal talent marketplace”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 450,000 a month (“oracle”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 66,611 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 7,410,638 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 280,257 · 54,144 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 265,940
Paid Google search: 9 searches its ads show for, about 43 clicks and $247 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

101+ ads · 101 text · 101 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Oracle America, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 64 before. 19 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 89 of 102 in internal talent marketpl

Segment leader

47%

Fuel50

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 44 answers
Its own site cited: in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on oracle.com

10,005

subdomains included

Content

481

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Glossary or explainer	220	undated
Conference or event	171	undated
Case study	37	undated
Template or tool	14	undated
Webinar or virtual event	13	undated
Report or ebook	13	undated
Blog	11	undated
Comparison	2	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page oracle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Oracle

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Oracle Trust Center: Our mission is securing your data
oracle.com/trust
For: organizations
oracle.com/trust
Price stated: Save $500 per person with special group pricing. oracle.com/ai-world/partners
Free plan or trial: Try Oracle Cloud Free Tier oracle.com/corporate/features/connect-analyze-integrate.html
Certifications: Common Criteria evaluation
Customers named: Liberty EnergyKobalt MusicNHS Shared Business ServicesWorldlineRappiAVConduentRenesas
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Oracle's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com, oracle.com/trust, oracle.com/corporate/features/connect-analyze-integrate.html, oracle.com/customers, oracle.com/ai-world/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.