Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 107 → 97 of 99
SAP · 1 category · RankedSAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
60Judge labels
0First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Workforce planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 35 of 98 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business100 of 102
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market35 of 98
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise11 of 83
0%34 labels
accepted challenger
In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 35 of 98 | 38% | 13 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 65 → 30 of 93
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 68
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 65 → 35 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative16 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative19 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Part of a full HCM suite with workforce planning, payroll, talent management, finance and analytics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best-in-class for global enterprises needing integrated talent and succession planning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Full SAP shop wanting talent + planning together? → SAP SuccessFactors” Kimi K2 · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“Companies already embedded in the SAP ecosystem (ERP).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to be cautious about: Embedded planning tools within massive ERPs like SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM, or NetSuite.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“intentionally excluded for professional services use cases because they are not designed to answer questions” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“you likely do not need the heavy, multi-million-dollar enterprise ERP modules (like SAP or Oracle)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · scale prompt · soft negative
“Strong feature depth, but at a heavy cost in complexity, support quality, and lock-in.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 60 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com39
peoplemanagingpeople.com30
g2.com20
happeo.com20
firsthr.app18
intervue.io18
worldmetrics.org18
learn.g2.com17
articsledge.com15
resources.rework.com14
209 of the 209 domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“sap successfactors workforce planning”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 98 in workforce planning
Segment leader
37%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 54 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP SuccessFactors 9SAP 1SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning & Analytics 1
Follow SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP Fieldglass, SAP GRC, SAP Joule and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Solutions including SAP SuccessFactors support these steps with integrated analytics and scenario planning, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and adapt quickly to shifting workforce demands.
- For
- HR leaders
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sap.com/resources/what-is-workforce-planning, sap.com/resources/strategic-workforce-planning, sap.com/products/hcm/workforce-planning.html, sap.com/sea/resources/strategic-workforce-planning, sap.com/mena/resources/strategic-workforce-planning. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.