Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	0%	91 of 93	47%	17	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	23 of 78	25%	12	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HR help desk and case management	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	55 of 108	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Benefits administration	Core HR and payroll	0%	20 of 67	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Gusto at 20%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
HRIS and HCM platforms	Core HR and payroll	0%	15 of 66	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	83 of 98	50%	6	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	81 of 85	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HR compliance and policy management	Core HR and payroll	0%	83 of 97	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	96 of 114	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM held within the floor in all nine categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Succession planning · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 91 → 86 of 88

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 34 → 85 of 87

Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 12 of 71

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Succession planning	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 34 → 91 of 93
Workforce management sui	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 43 → 23 of 78
HR help desk	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 73 → 55 of 108
Benefits administration	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 20 of 67, unchanged
HRIS and HCM platforms	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 34 → 15 of 66
Workforce planning	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 66 → 83 of 98
Performance management	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 50 → 81 of 85
HR compliance	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 80 → 83 of 97
People analytics	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 87 → 96 of 114

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	2	2	0	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	3	2	6
Mistral Small	0	1	5	1	7
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	5	6
Kimi K2	0	3	0	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2	1	5
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	2	3	7
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	3	4	4	11

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct40 labels1

Paraphrase41 labels1

Comparative95 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained28 labels4

Scale-constrained23 labelsNone

Negative81 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative308 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look first at Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, and Oracle” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · comparative prompt · first choice

“Excels in AI-driven enterprise planning and is favored by large organizations with complex workforce structures.” Mistral Small · HRIS and HCM platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“best fit for large enterprises that need repeatable, position-and-hierarchy governed headcount scenarios” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Oracle Taleo Succession Planning Cloud Service is positioned as Identify and develop future leaders” Muse Glimmer 30B · Succession planning · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools/Types to Avoid Entirely (Overkill for Small Teams): - Enterprise HCM Suites like Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR help desk · negative prompt · hard negative

“avoid dedicated enterprise-suite software (like SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle) which can cost tens of thousands of dollars a year” Muse Glimmer 30B · Succession planning · negative prompt · hard negative

“Who should avoid: Mid-market companies, or any organization without a dedicated Oracle admin team and a strong IT budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Performance management · negative prompt · hard negative

“Aging on-premise or cloud modules noted for clunky interfaces, steep learning curves, and scalability problems” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR help desk · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, over the 308 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP SuccessFactors179 of 30812Not among the top eight

UKG Pro122 of 30813Not among the top eight

ADP Workforce Now89 of 3087Not among the top eight

Rippling88 of 30813Not among the top eight

Workday HCM80 of 30845Not among the top eight

Dayforce78 of 3086Not among the top eight

BambooHR75 of 30813Not among the top eight

Workday51 of 30819Not among the top eight

SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development48 of 30812Not among the top eight

Workday Succession Planning48 of 30811Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 283 of the 308 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com117

peoplemanagingpeople.com98

firsthr.app80

hibob.com78

darwinbox.com68

g2.com67

forbes.com60

worldmetrics.org54

gitnux.org53

hr-ai-index.com50

725 of the 725 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

engagedly.com/blog/best-succession-planning-softwares32

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software29

skillpanel.com/blog/succession-planning-software-227

guideflow.com/blog/succession-planning-software26

firsthr.app/compare/core-hr/workforce-management-software25

hibob.com/blog/best-hris-large-companies24

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/hris-systems21

erpresearch.com/en-us/erp-for-human-resources20

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“oracle fusion cloud hcm”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Its own site: It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 91 of 93 in succession planning

Segment leader

28%

Lattice

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 308 answers
Its own site cited: in 283 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle HCM Cloud 15Oracle HCM 13Oracle 10Oracle Cloud HCM 5Oracle Cloud HCM / Oracle Workforce Planning 1Oracle Fusion 1Oracle Fusion/ Oracle HCM 1Oracle HCM / Oracle Taleo Succession Planning Cloud Service 1Oracle HCM / Taleo 1Oracle HCM Cloud (w/ WFM) 1Oracle HCM Cloud / Legacy SAP (e.g., ECC) 1Oracle HCM Cloud / Oracle Workforce Modeling / Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 1Oracle HCM Cloud Succession Planning 1Oracle Succession Planning / Oracle HCM 1

Follow Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is the company behind Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Oracle: Oracle ASCP, Oracle Cloud EPM, Oracle Compensation, Oracle EBS, Oracle E‑Business Suite, Oracle Fusion, Oracle Fusion Agentic Applications, Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation and 24 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: an implementation program for mid-enterprise organizations that delivers fast time to value by establishing foundational HR capabilities in as little as six months
oracle.com/ae/human-capital-management/hcm-now
For: mid-enterprise organizations
oracle.com/ae/human-capital-management/hcm-now
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/ae/human-capital-management/hcm-now, oracle.com/apac/human-capital-management/hcm-now, oracle.com/asean/human-capital-management/hcm-now, oracle.com/latam/human-capital-management/hcm-now, oracle.com/africa/human-capital-management/hcm-now. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.