AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › SAP SuccessFactors Skills · October 2026 Edition
SAP · 1 category · Ranked

SAP SuccessFactors Skills

20Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Skills intelligence for enterprise buyers
Rank 39 of 127 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Skills for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%39 of 1270%3under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, SAP SuccessFactors Skills held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 146 → 135 of 139
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 146 → 47 of 117
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 26 of 92

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Skills intelligence0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 146 → 39 of 127

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Skills across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SAP SuccessFactors are best when you are already on those HCM suites” Muse Glimmer 30B · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · alternative
“Workday Skills Cloud or SAP SuccessFactors Skills” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Skills, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Skills was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workday Skills Cloud18 of 201Not among the top eight
Eightfold AI15 of 205Not among the top eight
Gloat11 of 200Not among the top eight
TechWolf7 of 202Not among the top eight
Fuel507 of 201Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand6 of 200Not among the top eight
365Talents5 of 200Not among the top eight
Degreed5 of 200Not among the top eight
Beamery4 of 200Not among the top eight
Phenom4 of 200Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Skills. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Skills and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com13
darwinbox.com11
hrtechsaas.com9
firsthr.app7
g2.com7
hr-ai-index.com7
skywork.ai6
acorn.works5
docebo.com5
guideflow.com5

Seventy-five of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Skills came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where SAP SuccessFactors Skills stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
10 a month (“sap successfactors skills”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 127 in skills intelligence
Segment leader
18%
Skills Base
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as SAP SuccessFactors Skills

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors Skills; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP SuccessFactors 1

Follow SAP SuccessFactors Skills

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Skills.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Identify skill gaps and build data-driven development strategies to support your organization's growth.
For
human resource management teams
Customers named
CapgeminiEY
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What SAP SuccessFactors Skills's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sap.com/blogs/sap-successfactors-degreed, sap.com/blogs/sap-successfactors-skillsoft, sap.com/blogs/skill-set-capgemini-skills-journey, sap.com/blogs/skill-set-ey-building-skills-first-future, sap.com/products/hcm/successfactors-learning-skill-inference-for-learning.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Skills's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Skills, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors Skills by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SAP SuccessFactors Skills is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors Skills, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.