Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 49 of 74, unchanged
SAP · 3 categories · Named, not rankedSAP SuccessFactors HCM
14Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP SuccessFactors HCM was named 6 times in Learning experience plat and 2 other categories, where 360Learning led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business51 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 89
4%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors HCM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 4% | 7 of 89 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 76 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 40 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP SuccessFactors HCM held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 of 84, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 5% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now. | New this edition | Rank 7 of 89, unchanged |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 102, unchanged |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 40 of 93 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors HCM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors HCM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best learning experience platform for a mid-market B2B company is SAP SuccessFactors HCM, according to G2.” Llama 4 Maverick · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, SAP SuccessFactors HCM and TalentLMS are top choices” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · first choice
“look first at Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, and Oracle” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · comparative prompt · first choice
“For a unified HR and learning solution: SAP SuccessFactors HCM is a strong choice.” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"interface not user-friendly, citing a steep learning curve and complexity in navigating features"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors HCM, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors HCM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors HCM, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors HCM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors HCM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors HCM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com13
goskills.com5
guideflow.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
gartner.com3
thinkific.com3
capterra.com2
f6s.com2
forbes.com2
getapp.com2
Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors HCM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as SAP SuccessFactors HCM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors HCM; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP SuccessFactors HCM / LXP modules 1
Follow SAP SuccessFactors HCM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors HCM.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors HCM.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP Fieldglass, SAP GRC, SAP Joule and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-enabled talent intelligence software
- For
- HR leaders
- Price stated
- free trial sap.com/blogs/re-discover-the-sap-successfactors-hcm-free-trial
- Free plan or trial
- free SAP SuccessFactors HCM trial sap.com/blogs/re-discover-the-sap-successfactors-hcm-free-trial
- Certifications
- SAP-endorsed partner
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What SAP SuccessFactors HCM's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sap.com/blogs/sap-successfactors-beamery, sap.com/blogs/sap-successfactors-degreed, sap.com/blogs/sap-successfactors-skillsoft, sap.com/blogs/re-discover-the-sap-successfactors-hcm-free-trial, sap.com/products/hcm/about-successfactors.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors HCM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors HCM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors HCM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP SuccessFactors HCM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors HCM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.