Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 97 of 139, unchanged
4 categories · Named, not rankedNeobrain
16Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Neobrain was named 6 times in Skills intelligence and 3 other categories, where Skills Base led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business100 of 144
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 127
4%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise11 of 99
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Neobrain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 4% | 9 of 127 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 27 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 75 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 39 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Neobrain held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 of 117, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 92, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 9 of 127, unchanged |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 27 of 102 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 75 of 93, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Neobrain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Neobrain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Neobrain and Fuel50 are top choices due to their AI capabilities, scalability” Mistral Small · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“Inference Tool | 365Talents or Neobrain” Kimi K2 · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Neobrain (for talent acquisition, workforce mobility, and skills development)” Mistral Small · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative
“Broader HR suites with integrated internal talent marketplace features.” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Neobrain, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Neobrain was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Neobrain, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Neobrain was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Neobrain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Neobrain and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
hrtechsaas.com6
darwinbox.com5
gartner.com5
hr-ai-index.com5
guideflow.com4
pin.com4
skima.ai4
360learning.com3
Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Neobrain came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on neobrain.io
746
subdomains included
Content
500
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
28 · 48
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 438 | 31 | 2026-09-25 | HRIS and HCM platforms, Workforce planning | |
| Case study | 46 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Agents ia rh definition fonctionnement impacts blog
- 2026-09-25Calendrier rh blog
- 2026-09-25Fiabiliser vos referentiels de competences blog
- 2026-09-23All about ai agents blog
- 2026-09-17Pilotage competences donnees decisions rh blog
- 2026-09-17Cartographie competences lia blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page neobrain.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Neobrain
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Neobrain is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Neobrain is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Skills-based Talent Management Suite
- For
- HR teams
- Price stated
- Free demo on request neobrain.io
- Starting price
- 0 neobrain.io
- Free plan or trial
- Free demo on request neobrain.io
- Customers named
- BPCELa PostePwCSogeclairCNP AssurancesPromod
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Neobrain's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: neobrain.io, neobrain.io/solutions/talent-marketplace, neobrain.io/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Neobrain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Neobrain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Neobrain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Neobrain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Neobrain, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.