Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 → 61 of 104
5 categories · RankediSpring Learn
114Judge labels
9First choices
6Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Compliance training for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 82 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of iSpring Learn →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business65 of 112
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 82
4%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise46 of 96
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named iSpring Learn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 4% | 7 of 82 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 2% | 11 of 92 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 12 of 61 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 16 of 95 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 29 of 89 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, iSpring Learn held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 27 → 7 of 76
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 → 43 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 7 of 82 |
| Compliance training | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 11 of 92 |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 of 61, unchanged |
| Online course libraries | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 of 95, unchanged |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 29 of 89 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated iSpring Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated iSpring Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labelsNone
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative24 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained36 labels5
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with iSpring Learn (if you want to create your own content) or EasyLlama (if you want ready-made courses)” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with iSpring Suite for course creation combined with iSpring Learn for delivery and tracking” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend LearnUpon or iSpring Learn depending on your priority” Perplexity Sonar · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“iSpring LMS starts at $3.58 per user per month, making it very affordable for corporate training.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iSpring Learn, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iSpring Learn was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iSpring Learn, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iSpring Learn was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iSpring Learn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 112 of the 114 answers that named iSpring Learn and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ispring.comYour site65
goskills.com55
talentlms.com54
firsthr.app41
forbes.com40
learnworlds.com39
capterra.com38
proprofstraining.com34
thinkific.com33
docebo.com29
363 of the 428 domain citations in answers naming iSpring Learn came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ispring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iSpring Learn takes 4% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ispring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iSpring Learn takes 4% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “authoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “elearning authoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“ispring learn”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 53,048 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,439 · 263 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,782
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $46 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 114 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 112 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ispring.com
312
subdomains included
Content
58
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
28 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 34 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 16 | 0 | 2026-04-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-13 | ||
| Blog | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-13Free employee onboarding checklists and templates template or tool
- 2026-04-06Teachable alternatives comparison
- 2026-03-23Offboarding checklist template or tool
- 2026-03-23Kajabi alternatives comparison
- 2026-03-17What is elearning glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-16D2l brightspace alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ispring.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as iSpring Learn
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iSpring Learn; a claim can dispute any of them.
iSpring LMS 5iSpring Suite & iSpring Learn 1
Follow iSpring Learn
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
iSpring Learn is its own company.ShowHide
The company
iSpring Learn is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A powerful corporate LMS for business growth
- For
- business
- Price stated
- 100 users $6.91 USD per user/month; $8,286 annual price; 300 users $4.46 USD per user/month; $16,050 annual price; 500 users $3.97 USD per user/month; $23,790 annual price ispring.com
- Starting price
- 3.97 ispring.com
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day trial. No credit card required. ispring.com
- Customers named
- NAOS BiodermaForever DirectCentral OneOticon, Inc.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What iSpring Learn's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ispring.com, ispring.com/pricing, ispring.com/solutions/retail-lms, ispring.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iSpring Learn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iSpring Learn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iSpring Learn by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iSpring Learn is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iSpring Learn, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.