Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 47 → 66 of 74
SAP · 3 categories · RankedSAP SuccessFactors Learning
69Judge labels
1First choices
15Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Learning management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 61 of 89 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business68 of 76
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market61 of 89
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 62
0%18 labels
accepted challenger
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 61 of 89 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 52 of 61 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 70 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP SuccessFactors Learning held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 73 → 59 of 84
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 11 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 61 of 89 |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 61, unchanged |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase14 labelsNone
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative15 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Part of the top 5 corporate LMS vendors” Muse Glimmer 30B · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you want to avoid both lightweight, bare-bones systems ... and monolithic enterprise systems (like SAP SuccessFactors or Workday Learning, which are expensive and heavily administrative)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · scale prompt · hard negative
“Avoid traditional Legacy Learning Management Systems (like older versions of Blackboard or rigid SAP SuccessFactors implementations)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative
“not quite large enough to justify massive enterprise systems like Cornerstone OnDemand or SAP SuccessFactors, which often come with heavy implementation costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Learning, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Learning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Learning, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Learning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 69 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Learning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
goskills.com27
docebo.com25
talentlms.com22
g2.com19
ispring.com19
forbes.com15
teachfloor.com15
firsthr.app14
360learning.com13
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
182 of the 182 domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Learning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SAP SuccessFactors Learning stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SAP SuccessFactors Learning stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“sap successfactors learning”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 22 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on SAP's site (sap.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 61 of 89 in learning experience plat
Segment leader
26%
360Learning
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 69 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 60 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SAP SuccessFactors Learning
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP SuccessFactors 4SAP SuccessFactors LMS 1
Follow SAP SuccessFactors Learning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Learning.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Learning.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP Fieldglass, SAP GRC, SAP Joule and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unlock workforce potential with skill building content for everyone
- Price stated
- This AI offering can only be bought as part of the package Joule Premium for Customer Experience and is not available seperately. sap.com/italy/products/hcm/successfactors-learning-skill-inference-for-learning.html
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What SAP SuccessFactors Learning's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com/partners/profile/go1-learning-content-for-sap-successfactors, sap.com/products/hcm/successfactors-learning-skill-inference-for-learning.html, sap.com/products/hcm/successfactors-learning-image-generation-for-learning.html, sap.com/products/hcm/successfactors-learning-personalized-learning-recommendations.html, sap.com/italy/products/hcm/successfactors-learning-skill-inference-for-learning.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors Learning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP SuccessFactors Learning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors Learning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.