AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › EasyLlama · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

EasyLlama

126Judge labels
31First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
49% in Compliance training for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of EasyLlama →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EasyLlama for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compliance trainingLearning and development8%5 of 920%42accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll0%65 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, EasyLlama held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compliance training · by segment

Small business▲+19Since September 2026: 33% → 51%, +19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
51%from 33% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 61
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 89
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 13 of 86

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compliance training5%9%▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 6 → 5 of 92
HR compliance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 65 of 97, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated EasyLlama across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502204
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash05106
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast03205
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K212104
GLM 4.7 FlashX11103
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B02305

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels9
Paraphrase23 labels9
Comparative29 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained28 labels9
Scale-constrained13 labels4
Negative11 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative126 labels in all, every segment counted; 31 of the 47 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My top recommendation: EasyLlama at $19.95/user/year offers the best balance of affordability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and SC Training are excellent choices for very small teams” Mistral Small · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“1. EasyLlama ⭐ *Best Overall for Mid-Market*” Kimi K2 · Compliance training · direct prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama (if you want ready-made courses)” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EasyLlama, over the 126 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EasyLlama was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NAVEX50 of 1267Not among the top eight
iSpring Learn27 of 1261Not among the top eight
Skillsoft Percipio25 of 1260Not among the top eight
Coggno21 of 1264Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EasyLlama. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 126 of the 126 answers that named EasyLlama and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coggno.com68
easyllama.comYour site63
traliant.com44
expertinsights.com43
firsthr.app43
thinkific.com43
valamis.com42
knowlify.com41
bizlibrary.com39
continu.com38

401 of the 464 domain citations in answers naming EasyLlama came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

easyllama.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, EasyLlama takes 8% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
8
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“easyllama”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
24 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 80,528 a month
Searches its site ranks for
10,630 · 141 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,949
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
84 ads · 81 text, 3 image · 15 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as EASYLLAMA, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 33 in the year, 51 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
First choices
31 across its categories
Named in
126 answers
Its own site cited
in 126 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on easyllama.com
1,768
subdomains included
Content
595
counted in the table below
Documentation
174
Product · Integration
47 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog4241002026-09-28
Report or ebook8102025-12-01
Glossary or explainer3652026-09-29
Comparison1982026-08-03
Case study16undated
News or press9undated
Template or tool622026-08-03
Webinar or virtual event4undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page easyllama.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow EasyLlama

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

EasyLlama is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Compliance Training & LMS Platform
For
HR, People Ops, and Compliance leaders
Price stated
19.95 easyllama.com
Starting price
19.95 easyllama.com
Free plan or trial
While we don’t currently offer a free trial, our team provides personalized demos easyllama.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
40 easyllama.com · 50 easyllama.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPASOC2 Type II certifiedGDPR-compliant
Customers named
Shake ShackShowpadGoodwillNatural RetreatsAdams Fairacre Farms
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What EasyLlama's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: easyllama.com, easyllama.com/pricing, trust.easyllama.com, easyllama.com/product/lms, easyllama.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EasyLlama's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EasyLlama, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EasyLlama by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where EasyLlama is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name EasyLlama, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at easyllama.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.