Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 → 15 of 50
5 categories · RankedLearnUpon
96Judge labels
12First choices
14Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Learning management syst for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LearnUpon →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 52
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 61
9%24 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise16 of 72
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LearnUpon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 9% | 3 of 61 | 0% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 18% → 9%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 4% | 6 of 89 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 4% | 4 of 82 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 22 of 95 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 39 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LearnUpon held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning management syst · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 18% → 9%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 16 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management syst | 18% | 9% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 18% → 9%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 61 |
| Learning experience plat | 2% | 5% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 6 of 89 |
| Course authoring tools | 3% | 4% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 4 of 82 |
| Online course libraries | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 of 95, unchanged |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 39 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LearnUpon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LearnUpon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels3
Paraphrase25 labels6
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labels3
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative96 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LearnUpon is practically built for the B2B mid-market... Choose LearnUpon if you need a flexible, multi-tenant system to train your staff, partners, and customers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall for B2B: LearnUpon ... My recommendation: Start with a demo of LearnUpon.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, LearnUpon is the strongest all-around recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · direct prompt · first choice
“LearnUpon or Docebo are often the strongest contenders.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LearnUpon, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnUpon was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LearnUpon, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnUpon was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LearnUpon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 96 answers that named LearnUpon and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
goskills.com43
docebo.com42
talentlms.com38
learnworlds.com35
d2l.com34
ispring.com33
forbes.com27
thinkific.com26
360learning.com23
proprofstraining.com21
322 of the 322 domain citations in answers naming LearnUpon came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
learnupon.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LearnUpon takes 9% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
learnupon.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LearnUpon takes 9% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lms for employee training”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“learnupon”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 55 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 81,523 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,085 · 461 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,984
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 3 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 96 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 90 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on learnupon.com
477
subdomains included
Content
397
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 240 | 7 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 41 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Case study | 39 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| News or press | 31 | 5 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 2 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 13 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Extended enterprise lms blog
- 2026-09-15Extended enterpise training blog
- 2026-09-14Learnupon at world of learning birmingham conference or event
- 2026-09-10The macro shift intelligent vs artificial comparison
- 2026-09-09Ai in learning development report 2026 blog
- 2026-09-09The learning signal podcast podcast or video
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 6, 2026 to October 7, 2026World of Learning BirminghamNEC Birmingham, Birmingham, null · exhibited
- September 24, 2026Chief Customer Officer Summit San FranciscoSan Francisco
As the event pages on learnupon.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page learnupon.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LearnUpon
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LearnUpon; a claim can dispute any of them.
LearnUpon / TalentLMS 1LearnUpon LMS 1
Follow LearnUpon
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LearnUpon is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LearnUpon is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic Learning Platform
- For
- learning teams, learning leaders, and organizations training employees, customers, and associations
- Price stated
- View Plans learnupon.com
- Starting price
- From 100 Users learnupon.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001:2022 certifiedISO 27701:2019 certifiedSOC 2 compliantGDPR compliant
- Hosting
- EUUSAustralia
- Customers named
- Premium Retail ServicesClearGovGTreasuryMIDFLORIDAFlorida RealtorsgWorksMIDFLORIDA Credit Union
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations
What LearnUpon's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: learnupon.com, learnupon.com/pricing, learnupon.com/security, learnupon.com/platform, learnupon.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LearnUpon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LearnUpon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LearnUpon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LearnUpon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LearnUpon, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where LearnUpon is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where LearnUpon is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideLearnUpon is among the products AI models recommend first in Learning management systems this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.