5 categories · RankedRecruiterflow
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 3% | 7 of 136 | 8% | 13 | accepted challenger | |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 30 of 111 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 70 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 70 of 75 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 52 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Recruiterflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with Vincere or RecruiterFlow” MiniMax M2.5 · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Loxo or Recruiterflow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Staffing agency tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for Mid-Market Agencies ... Good balance of features and affordability for mid-sized companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“newer platforms like Recruiterflow and Loxo are redefining what's possible with AI and automation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Can be slow to load; no ability to send surveys or scorecards to candidates” MiniMax M2.5 · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“Recruit CRM and Recruiterflow may be better for smaller operations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Staffing agency tools · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Recruiterflow, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Recruiterflow was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 56 answers that named Recruiterflow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
201 of the 229 domain citations in answers naming Recruiterflow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
recruiterflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Recruiterflow takes 3% of first choices and Zoho Recruit takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“recruiterflow”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 18 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 30,455 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,177 · 303 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,224
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 56 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 56 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 34 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 19 | 7 | 2026-09-27 | ||
| Case study | 17 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 17 | undated | |||
| Blog | 14 | 11 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28What makes recruiterflow ai native recruiting software blog
- 2026-09-28Candidate database blog
- 2026-09-28Ats migration for recruitment firm blog
- 2026-09-28How to build recruitment dashboards blog
- 2026-09-28Hiring process blog
- 2026-09-28Skills based hiring blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page recruiterflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Recruiterflow
Follow Recruiterflow
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Recruiterflow is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native ATS & CRM software for executive search firms, recruiting agencies and staffing agencies
- For
- executive search firms, recruiting agencies and staffing agencies
- Price stated
- Demo available on request recruiterflow.com
- Starting price
- 119 recruiterflow.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 30 recruiterflow.com/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR compliant
- Customers named
- AndiamoPAC SolutionsMercury HamptonTotal Aviation StaffingThe Leaders LabContinuity PartnersGuy Last RecruitmentNewance
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, hosting
What Recruiterflow's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: recruiterflow.com, recruiterflow.com/pricing, recruiterflow.com/customers, recruiterflow.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recruiterflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recruiterflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Recruiterflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Recruiterflow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Recruiterflow, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.