Every category where a model named Vincere for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Staffing agency platforms	Talent acquisition	5%	5 of 136	0%	15	accepted challenger
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	95 of 111	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vincere yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vincere across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels3

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Vincere if you want a modern, unified platform that handles both permanent and contract staffing out of the box” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · first choice

“Vincere offers the best balance of features, modern UX, transparent pricing, and implementation speed” Kimi K2 · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · first choice

“volume and temp/contract pay-bill needs → Bullhorn / Vincere / Avionté Bold / TargetRecruit” Muse Glimmer 30B · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with Vincere or RecruiterFlow” MiniMax M2.5 · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vincere, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vincere was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bullhorn30 of 3222Compare →

JobDiva11 of 320Not among the top eight

Recruiterflow10 of 321Compare →

Ceipal10 of 320Not among the top eight

Crelate10 of 320Not among the top eight

JobAdder10 of 320Not among the top eight

Recruit CRM10 of 320Compare →

Loxo9 of 321Compare →

Aviont\u00e98 of 320Not among the top eight

TargetRecruit7 of 320Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vincere. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 32 answers that named Vincere and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app19

pin.com16

hiretruffle.com15

bullhorn.com13

metaview.ai13

recruiterflow.com12

selectsoftwarereviews.com12

g2.com11

jazzhr.com11

larksuite.com10

132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Vincere came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/staffing-agency-software19

hiretruffle.com/blog/best-staffing-crms15

pin.com/blog/staffing-agency-software12

jazzhr.com/insights/best-staffing-agency-software11

metaview.ai/resources/blog/recruitment-agency-software11

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruiting-and-staffing-agency-software11

assembly.com/blog/staffing-agency-software9

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/staffing-agency-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

vincere.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Vincere takes 5% of first choices and Zoho Recruit takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “staffing agency platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “staffing agency platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“vincere”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 271 a month

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 136 in staffing agency tools

Segment leader

22%

Zoho Recruit

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 32 answers
Its own site cited: in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Vincere

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Vincere; a claim can dispute any of them.

Vincere (Access Vincere Evo) 3Vincere (Evo) 1Vincere / Access Vincere Evo 1

Follow Vincere

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vincere's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vincere, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Vincere by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Vincere is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Vincere, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.