3 categories · RankedJobDiva
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing agency platforms | Talent acquisition | 2% | 12 of 136 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 97 of 104 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 30 of 65 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated JobDiva across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“platforms like Bullhorn, Ceipal, and JobDiva are particularly well-suited for mid-to-large agencies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Staffing agency tools · scale prompt · first choice
“JobDiva excels when you want a proprietary, AI‑powered search engine plus extensive back‑office integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative
“best for staffing agencies looking for an all-in-one system at an affordable price” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Staffing agency tools · budget prompt · alternative
“JobDiva if you're a high-volume staffing agency with more complex workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Staffing agency tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid platforms like Bullhorn or JobDiva initially” Kimi K2 · Staffing agency tools · budget prompt · hard negative
“Users report sluggish performance when switching between modules” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Candidate management flaws, emails to spam, mobile limitations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JobDiva, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JobDiva was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 57 answers that named JobDiva and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
211 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming JobDiva came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jobdiva.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, JobDiva takes 2% of first choices and Zoho Recruit takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“jobdiva”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 46 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,977 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 929 · 25 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,300
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 57 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 61 | undated | Applicant tracking syste, HRIS and HCM platforms | ||
| Blog | 51 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| News or press | 47 | undated | Background screening | ||
| Case study | 40 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-05-06Why the old screening playbook is failing recruiters blog
- 2026-02-05The hidden engine of staffing performance candidate engagement blog
- 2025-07-30Hiring freeze what it is how staffing agencies can respond blog
- 2024-11-14Tips for managing applicant data why it is important blog
- 2024-07-26Staffing dynamics sourcing vs. recruiting blog
- 2024-05-22Transforming staffing with jobdivas cutting edge ai and automation tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jobdiva.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as JobDiva
Follow JobDiva
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
JobDiva is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Your Top Staffing Software | Applicant Tracking System | JobDiva
- For
- staffing agencies
- Free plan or trial
- Request a free demo jobdiva.com
- Integrations claimed
- 100 jobdiva.com
- Hosting
- North AmericaUnited KingdomAPACEMEA
- Customers named
- ICON Information ConsultantsIntelliswiftTalentBurstUrsus
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications
What JobDiva's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: jobdiva.com, jobdiva.com/solution/back-office. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JobDiva's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JobDiva, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JobDiva by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where JobDiva is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name JobDiva, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.