AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Range · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Range

6Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Range was named 2 times in Goals and OKRs, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Range for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Goals and OKRsPerformance and talent management0%54 of 6850%2under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Range held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 25 of 58
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 54 of 62
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 of 54, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Goals and OKRs0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 46 → 54 of 68

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Range across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“all tripped basic functional tests in hands-on testing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Range, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Range was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Perdoo5 of 63Not among the top eight
Profit.co5 of 61Not among the top eight
OKRs Tool5 of 60Not among the top eight
Tability4 of 61Not among the top eight
Mooncamp4 of 60Not among the top eight
Teamflect4 of 60Not among the top eight
Weekdone4 of 60Not among the top eight
Betterworks3 of 60Not among the top eight
Oboard3 of 60Not among the top eight
ClickUp2 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Range. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Range and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mooncamp.com5
okrstool.com5
tability.io5
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
perdoo.com4
cascade.app3
profit.co3
loach.app2
ones.com2
peoplemanager.net2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Range came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on rangeyourself.com
463
subdomains included
Content
331
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog238422026-09-15
Comparison92132026-07-20
Template or tool112026-09-16

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rangeyourself.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Range

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Range is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Independent verification publisher
For
consumer-health programs, AI subscriptions, and business software buyers
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Range's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: rangeyourself.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Range's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Range, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Range by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Range is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Range, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rangeyourself.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.