Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 of 58, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedOboard
12Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oboard was named 6 times in Goals and OKRs, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business44 of 63
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 68
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise41 of 61
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oboard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 2% | 12 of 68 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oboard held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 11 of 62
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 39 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 12 of 68 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Oboard and OKRSTOOL appear to be the top choices” Mistral Small · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Jira & Salesforce-Heavy Organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“all tripped basic functional tests in hands-on testing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oboard, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oboard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oboard, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oboard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oboard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Oboard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tability.io11
okrstool.com9
mooncamp.com7
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
teamflect.com6
guideflow.com5
okrinstitute.org5
profit.co5
cascade.app4
ones.com4
Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Oboard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
oboard.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Oboard takes 2% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
oboard.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Oboard takes 2% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “okr software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“oboard”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,279 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 519 · 25 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 306
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on oboard.io
263
subdomains included
Content
98
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 73 | 7 | 2026-09-25 | Goals and OKRs | |
| Case study | 15 | 0 | 2026-04-30 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Okr tool for microsoft blog
- 2026-09-22How to choose an okr expert blog
- 2026-08-27Change management strategy blog
- 2026-08-13Hr okrs blog
- 2026-07-27Companies using okrs blog
- 2026-07-21Okr best practices blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page oboard.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Oboard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oboard is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Oboard is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Powerful OKR management software with deep integrations for Jira, Confluence, monday.com and Salesforce.
- For
- teams
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial oboard.io
- Certifications
- AICPA SOC 2Marketplace Partner Programregistered ISV PartnerSOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- Frankfurt AZ
- Customers named
- trivagoBenefit SystemsRepublic BankVistaGDMMinistry of Digital Transformation of UkraineAltexSoftBookwire
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations
What Oboard's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oboard.io, trust.oboard.io, oboard.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oboard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oboard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oboard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oboard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oboard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.