| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 19 of 58 | 29% | 21 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| PEO providers | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 23 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Justworks at 24% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 19 of 58 |
| PEOs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 53, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ideal for companies already using QuickBooks for accounting, offering seamless integration.” MiniMax M2.5 · Payroll software · direct prompt · alternative
“QuickBooks Payroll is the natural fit if your finance team already works inside QuickBooks.” Perplexity Sonar · Payroll software · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Small business owners who want their CFO to stay out of the backend operations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Payroll software · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pick QuickBooks Payroll if you're already all-in on QuickBooks for your bookkeeping.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Payroll software · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Terrible customer support ... Over 4,100 complaints with the BBB” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Payroll software · negative prompt · hard negative
“entry-level payroll solutions (like basic Gusto, QuickBooks, or Patriot Software) ... will likely start to feel manual, slow, and operationally risky” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Payroll software · scale prompt · soft negative
“also named in that same discussion as a platform to be cautious about for support and fee transparency” Muse Glimmer 30B · Payroll software · negative prompt · soft negative
“your volume is too high for simple Small Business solutions (like basic Gusto or QuickBooks Online)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Payroll software · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 74 answers that named QuickBooks Payroll and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for QuickBooks Payroll, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuickBooks Payroll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuickBooks Payroll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuickBooks Payroll by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: