AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › QuickBooks Payroll · October 2026 Edition
QuickBooks · 2 categories · Ranked

QuickBooks Payroll

74Judge labels
6First choices
21Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Payroll software for small business buyers
Rank 19 of 58 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of QuickBooks Payroll →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In payroll software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named QuickBooks Payroll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Payroll softwareCore HR and payroll0%19 of 5829%21criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
PEO providersCore HR and payroll0%23 of 530%1under 10 labels · led by Justworks at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, QuickBooks Payroll held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Payroll software · by segment

Small business▲+9Since September 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 8 → 3 of 47
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 12 → 18 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 44 → 48 of 50

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Payroll software0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 19 of 58
PEOs0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 23 of 53, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated QuickBooks Payroll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01023
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02013
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00213

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase10 labels3
Comparative24 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative18 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative74 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Ideal for companies already using QuickBooks for accounting, offering seamless integration.” MiniMax M2.5 · Payroll software · direct prompt · alternative
“QuickBooks Payroll is the natural fit if your finance team already works inside QuickBooks.” Perplexity Sonar · Payroll software · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Small business owners who want their CFO to stay out of the backend operations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Payroll software · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pick QuickBooks Payroll if you're already all-in on QuickBooks for your bookkeeping.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Payroll software · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Terrible customer support ... Over 4,100 complaints with the BBB” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Payroll software · negative prompt · hard negative
“entry-level payroll solutions (like basic Gusto, QuickBooks, or Patriot Software) ... will likely start to feel manual, slow, and operationally risky” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Payroll software · scale prompt · soft negative
“also named in that same discussion as a platform to be cautious about for support and fee transparency” Muse Glimmer 30B · Payroll software · negative prompt · soft negative
“your volume is too high for simple Small Business solutions (like basic Gusto or QuickBooks Online)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Payroll software · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QuickBooks Payroll, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuickBooks Payroll was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gusto69 of 7433Not among the top eight
Rippling41 of 742Not among the top eight
Paychex Flex37 of 740Not among the top eight
OnPay31 of 746Not among the top eight
ADP RUN28 of 740Not among the top eight
Patriot Payroll26 of 743Not among the top eight
ADP26 of 741Not among the top eight
Deel15 of 740Not among the top eight
Workday11 of 742Not among the top eight
Paycom11 of 741Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuickBooks Payroll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 74 answers that named QuickBooks Payroll and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

Where QuickBooks Payroll stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“quickbooks payroll”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,820 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 58 in payroll software
Segment leader
20%
Rippling
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
74 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as QuickBooks Payroll

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as QuickBooks Payroll; a claim can dispute any of them.
QuickBooks 2Intuit QuickBooks Payroll 1QuickBooks Online 1QuickBooks Online (QBO) Payroll 1QuickBooks Online Payroll 1QuickBooks Payroll (Intuit Workforce) 1QuickBooks Payroll / Workforce 1

Follow QuickBooks Payroll

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

QuickBooks is the company behind QuickBooks Payroll.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuickBooks Payroll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuickBooks Payroll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuickBooks Payroll by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where QuickBooks Payroll is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name QuickBooks Payroll, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.