Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 → 55 of 60
Qualtrics 360 · 1 category · RankedQualtrics 360 Development
48Judge labels
9First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in 360 feedback for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business61 of 63
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 73
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise2 of 69
17%34 labels
accepted challenger
In 360 feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Qualtrics 360 Development for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 18 of 73 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Qualtrics 360 Development held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · 360 feedback · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 of 69, unchanged
Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 6% → 13%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 of 59, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 18 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Qualtrics 360 Development across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Qualtrics 360 Development across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase11 labels6
Comparative11 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Large enterprise organizations requiring massive scale, complex rater hierarchies, and advanced analytics.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · 360 feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“Research-grade analytics; strongest text analytics and statistical depth; enterprise scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · 360 feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises needing standardized 360 cycles with cohort-level reporting” MiniMax M2.5 · 360 feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Sophisticated survey logic and enterprise listening” Kimi K2 · 360 feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Qualtrics doesn't offer a full suite of performance management tools and pricing can be high for smaller companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qualtrics 360 Development, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qualtrics 360 Development was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qualtrics 360 Development, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qualtrics 360 Development was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qualtrics 360 Development. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 48 answers that named Qualtrics 360 Development and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
betterworks.com33
workhuman.com30
feedbackpulse.com28
teamflect.com24
sprad.io21
intervue.io17
effy.ai15
guideflow.com14
nanoglobals.com14
charliehr.com13
209 of the 209 domain citations in answers naming Qualtrics 360 Development came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
qualtrics.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Qualtrics 360 Development takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
qualtrics.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Qualtrics 360 Development takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “360 feedback tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “360-degree feedback tool”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“qualtrics 360 development”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- qualtrics.com shared with Qualtrics 360's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,028,410 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 49,516 · 6,871 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 146,721
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $21 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 73 in 360 feedback
Segment leader
34%
Lattice
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 48 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 46 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Qualtrics 360 Development
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qualtrics 360 Development; a claim can dispute any of them.
Qualtrics 5Qualtrics (360 Development) 1Qualtrics 360 1Qualtrics 360 (EmployeeXM) 1Qualtrics 360 / Employee Experience 1
Follow Qualtrics 360 Development
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Qualtrics 360 is the company behind Qualtrics 360 Development.ShowHide
The company
Qualtrics 360 is the company behind Qualtrics 360 Development.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- 効果の見える具体的なマネジャー・アクションをクアルトリクスのエンゲージメント調査と360評価で実現！
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Qualtrics 360 Development's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: learn.qualtrics.com/ja-360-development-webinar, learn.qualtrics.com/on-demand-webinar-employee-development-on-qualtrics-360, learn.qualtrics.com/ja-360-development-webinar/1073170, learn.qualtrics.com/ja-360-development-webinar/1073171, learn.qualtrics.com/ja-360-development-webinar/1843517. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qualtrics 360 Development's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qualtrics 360 Development, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qualtrics 360 Development by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Qualtrics 360 Development is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qualtrics 360 Development, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.