AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Picktime · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Picktime

6Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Picktime was named 3 times in Interview scheduling and 1 other category, where Calendly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Picktime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition0%75 of 75100%2under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%75 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37%

Movement

Since September 2026, Picktime held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 → 23 of 67
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 72 of 73
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 63 of 72, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Interview scheduling0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 21 → 75 of 75
Workforce scheduling0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 75 of 108, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Picktime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Good for reducing scheduling messages on a tighter budget, but less robust than enterprise recruiting tools.” Perplexity Sonar · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Solid for basics/free use, but limited for complex panels” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Picktime, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Picktime was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Calendly6 of 62Not among the top eight
YouCanBookMe5 of 61Not among the top eight
GoodTime4 of 61Not among the top eight
ModernLoop4 of 61Not among the top eight
Paradox4 of 60Not among the top eight
Setmore4 of 60Not among the top eight
VidCruiter4 of 60Not among the top eight
Doodle3 of 60Not among the top eight
Greenhouse3 of 60Not among the top eight
Koalendar2 of 61Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Picktime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Picktime and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cal.com6
youcanbook.me5
candidate.fyi3
firsthr.app3
g2.com3
hiretruffle.com3
koalendar.com3
lever.co3
lunacal.ai3
sapia.ai3

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Picktime came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

picktime.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Picktime takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “interview scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “interview scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“picktime”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
18 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 55,939 a month
Searches its site ranks for
18,465 · 333 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,884
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 image · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as BARG GARMENTS, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 75 of 75 in interview scheduling
Segment leader
20%
Calendly
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on picktime.com
2,340
subdomains included
Content
513
counted in the table below
Documentation
236
Product · Integration
29 · 28
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog399112026-09-10Workforce scheduling, Interview scheduling
Report or ebook78212026-09-10Workforce scheduling
Comparison19152026-09-09Workforce scheduling
Glossary or explainer902020-10-18
Conference or event612026-09-09
Webinar or virtual event112026-07-24
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page picktime.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Picktime

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Picktime is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free online appointment scheduling software and a booking management system that manages your appointments, classes, group bookings, reservations and staff.
For
Businesses
Price stated
Picktime offers a free solution for scheduling needs. picktime.com
Free plan or trial
free picktime.com
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Picktime's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: picktime.com, picktime.com/pricing, picktime.com/features/invoice, picktime.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Picktime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Picktime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Picktime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Picktime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Picktime, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at picktime.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.